playnext.fm
A glowing white wireframe model of a human brain on a black background

Topics / Social Sciences

Social Sciences Podcasts

259 shows and 23,723 episodes sit under Social Sciences.

Speaking of Psychology, LPRC, and Climate Economics with Arvid Viaene bring research interviews, practitioner discussions, and policy analysis to social science listening.

Photo: Mirella Callage on Unsplash · Unsplash License

Swipe · Social Sciences only

Swipe through Social Sciences

Save time discovering your next favourite podcast by listening to just the best minute of an episode.

Start swiping259 Social Sciences Podcasts and 23,723 Social Sciences Episodes

The social sciences slate · every cover a link

All 259 social sciences shows →

Before you press play

What Social Sciences podcasts actually cover

An argument at the dinner table can leave you wanting something more useful than a better comeback. Why does a belief survive repeated contradiction? Who gets to call a workplace fair? How does a private difficulty become a public problem? The strongest social science podcasts make those questions larger without making the people inside them smaller. They follow a family disagreement into the machinery of belief, or a school policy into the decisions that determine which children get another chance.

Listeners want understandable explanations, while also asking whether the research behind a memorable story survives scrutiny. A researcher’s credentials and an interviewer’s willingness to challenge them are separate reasons to trust a conversation. Choose by the attention you want to give: a reported life, a study examined closely, or an argument taking shape. The useful distinction is between a programme that makes its reasoning inspectable and one that asks confidence to do the work.

Lives that resist a tidy explanation

A theory of belief can explain only so much about sharing a home with someone who expects catastrophe. In Invisibilia’s Alternate Realities from NPR's Embedded, reporter Zach Mack follows the divide between himself and his father through family conversations. Survival supplies accumulate; money has been moved without his mother’s permission. His sister describes the hurt of being told that her father understands her sexuality better than she does. The disagreement has consequences beyond whether a prediction comes true.

The feed’s Proxy with Yowei Shaw offers a different encounter. George, seeking an explanation for his divorce, speaks with a woman who has experienced something resembling his former partner’s position. She talks about missing parts of her old life and struggling to explain the separation to friends. The exchange makes room for mutual understanding without promising closure.

These are introductions to other programmes carried by Invisibilia. The family story is the first of three episodes; the Proxy conversation offers an intimate, unresolved exchange.

Policy research you can follow step by step

The most revealing question in a policy interview is often an ordinary one: what actually happened to the people receiving the intervention?

JPAM's Closer Look makes that question consequential in 37. Effects of Center Based Child Care on Disadvantaged Children. Seth Gershenson interrupts to clarify how the programme paid for care and what families in the comparison group could access. Later, when he asks whether a benefit associated with six months of attendance might double over twelve, guest Chris Herbst cautions against assuming a straight-line relationship. The long conversation suits listeners who want to understand what a result permits them to say.

UChicago Economics Events and Conversations offers a shorter route through A Case for Public School Choice? Lessons from Los Angeles. Tess Vigeland asks how researchers compared neighbourhoods before and after a policy change, and whether the findings describe an average rather than every child’s experience. The discussion reaches beyond test scores to graduation and college enrolment.

DIAL’s The impact of inequality on the lives of children is a useful companion. One researcher argues that helping children catch up cannot by itself resolve the pressures on parents working exhausting hours. Together, these shows distinguish evaluating a programme from deciding whether it addresses the whole problem.

Anthropology makes the familiar strange

People Stuff turns everyday advice into a dispute about the rules everyone supposedly knows. In Dan and Michael Ruin the Economy (feat. Steve Black): Car-price delusion, medieval rec letters, and the AI rat with the huge penis., a question about recommendation letters opens into an argument about class advantage. Michael advises students to learn the unwritten game; Dan objects to professors who punish them for asking incorrectly. The disagreement gives the advice its interest. Expect profanity and teasing alongside the analysis.

A quieter, French-language approach comes from - Radio AlterNantes FM. In Moneko, l’argent des nôtres…, participants discussing a local currency ask how far local should extend. Paper money makes the question physical: people must be close enough to exchange it. They also discuss volunteer exhaustion and the limits of an earlier scheme. This is economics at the scale of the people trying to keep something running.

Research as a relationship

Fieldwork podcasts can make the process of learning about a community as absorbing as the eventual interpretation. Field Notes’ Ep. 48: Yulha Lhawa on Khroskyabs Language Documentation & Revitalization follows a speaker who became a researcher of her own language. Lhawa describes sharing collected stories through WeChat and reconsidering a language name that villagers did not recognise. Her recurring question is how the work can serve her community. Documentation becomes a negotiation over usefulness and belonging.

The mind, with room for competing accounts

Psychology audio ranges from practical guidance to disagreement about what an explanation should accomplish. In the German-language Rebellisch gesund: Gelingendes Leben & Besseres Arbeiten by detoxRebels, #163 Too Much: Wie wir handlungsfähig bleiben, wenn alles zu viel wird! Mit Psychologin Eva Asselmann connects overwhelm with decisions about where to spend energy. Jonas Höhn presses Asselmann on the difficulty of relinquishing something into which a person has already put substantial time and energy. Her suggestions include limiting news consumption and finding ways to participate locally. The exchange suits someone seeking orientation rather than a quick instruction.

New Books in Psychoanalysis gives authors longer room to develop their positions. In Neil Vickers and Derek Bolton, "Being Ill: On Sickness, Care and Abandonment" (Reaktion Books, 2024), Vickers argues that illness disturbs the relationships on which a life depends. His discussion of friends consciously supporting both the ill person and one another makes that argument tangible.

An author explaining a theory is an invitation to examine it. For the adjoining clinical questions, continue to the Medical Science page.

Technology: explanation, then speculation

Thinking With Mitch Joel turns questions about AI towards organisations. In A World Of Intelligent Machines With Steve Brown - TWMJ #1044, Brown argues that employees should help design AI systems because actual work differs from the procedures handbook. When Joel asks for concrete examples beyond a technology company’s own adoption, Brown says it is too early to offer good ones. Keep that qualification beside the ambitious forecast.

Climate and ethics ask who gets a say

The social questions around environmental change often begin where a technical description ends: who returns home, whose concerns count, and who decides?

Cultures of Energy’s 246 - Radioactive Governance (feat. Maxime Polleri) examines the tension between calls to return after the Fukushima disaster and demands for permanent evacuation. Polleri distinguishes among citizen scientists: worried parents, urban residents and farmers seeking to revitalise their region can bring different priorities to measurements of contamination. The conversation asks listeners to attend to those differences.

Science for the People approaches recovery through community reporting in #636 Life on an unruly planet. Madeleine Ostrander describes looking for people who gathered others after disaster while resisting the temptation to turn them into solitary saviours. This is an archive choice: the programme closes its run with #642 The Last Episode. The Environmental Science page offers a further route from these interests.

Knowing Animals extends questions of representation beyond humans. In Episode 248: Sentientist political liberalism with Eze Paez and Pablo Magaña, Josh Milburn asks how people making decisions for animals can adequately attend to them. The guests defend a model of diligent trusteeship. Choose it for an argument about justice rather than animal behaviour. For a broader change of scientific subject, use the Science page.

Where to start

  • For a family story: Invisibilia — Alternate Realities from NPR's Embedded. Begin with this first instalment and listen to each family member’s account of the divide.
  • For a manageable research interview: UChicago Economics Events and Conversations — A Case for Public School Choice? Lessons from Los Angeles. Follow the comparison between neighbourhoods.
  • For irreverent everyday anthropology: People Stuff — Dan and Michael Ruin the Economy (feat. Steve Black): Car-price delusion, medieval rec letters, and the AI rat with the huge penis. Try it for jokes and disagreement about class.
  • For research close to its community: Field Notes — Ep. 48: Yulha Lhawa on Khroskyabs Language Documentation & Revitalization. Follow the movement from collecting stories to making them useful.
  • For climate through human relationships: Science for the People — #636 Life on an unruly planet. Listen for how recovery depends on people organising together.

Featured shows below are part of the PlayNext catalog. Updated weekly.

Featured shows

8 shows, described rather than listed

Each has a short write-up and a note on what it does best here.

research explainer
Speaking of Psychology

Speaking of Psychology asks researchers clear questions about topics such as cheating, sports fandom, parenting, body image, and AI. It suits listeners who want measured explanations tied to familiar concerns.

wellbeing conversations
Rebellisch gesund: Gelingendes Leben & Besseres Arbeiten by detoxRebels

Moderator Jonas Höhn talks every other Wednesday with voices from psychology, medicine, sociology, neuroscience, and business about mental, physical, and social health, better work, and a fulfilling life.

genre roundtable
Treecorder - Science & Fiction Podcast

Treecorder invites science-fiction guests into relaxed conversations about the genre across books, film, television, and video games. It suits listeners who enjoy ideas and personalities without a formal lecture.

curious interviews
Here We Are

Here We Are pairs a curious, friendly host with guests who think aloud at length, using plain language, analogies, and quick clarifications. It suits listeners who like technical subjects discussed with classroom warmth.

practitioner workshop
LPRC

LPRC presents CrimeScience working sessions and weekly reviews in which guests carry long, evidence-minded discussions. It suits practitioners looking for concrete examples, decision logic, and operational takeaways.

inclusive stem seminar
Podcast on Inclusive Research and Innovation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics

This inclusive STEM podcast gives experts room to explain research methods, data gaps, institutional constraints, and practical consequences. It suits listeners comfortable with patient, seminar-style interviews.

climate policy analysis
Climate Economics with Arvid Viaene

Arvid Viaene talks with experts about carbon pricing, EU climate policy, trade subsidies, corporate emissions, and the EU ETS. It suits listeners following the economics and politics behind climate action.

everyday psychology
Psychology Tidbits

Psychology Tidbits connects psychology to third places, bluntness, driving, foreign television, mountains, online habits, and dating apps. It suits listeners who prefer focused topics rooted in everyday behavior.