User Error is built around questions from its audience. Joe, Alan and Dan introduce themselves by name, then work through submissions tagged 'ask error' on Twitter, sent by email through error.show, or posted in a Jupiter Broadcasting Telegram group. Some questions are technical. Most are not, and the conversation gives both kinds the same loose attention. On Linux and open source, the talk can get properly considered. One stretch argues that a desktop feels polished when it is internally consistent, with every application behaving like the last, rather than when it looks expensive. Spartan or fancy matters less than whether it works. Another weighs whether open-sourcing an old Windows release would change anything, and lands on a practical objection: who would maintain the security updates for a code base that size? Talk of Ubuntu becomes a question about what success means for a Linux project, with the answer depending on who is doing the measuring. One episode also gives Dan room to plug a crowdfunder for an app center meant to bring indie open source apps to more Linux distributions. The wider tech talk leans on opinion. Twitter and Facebook are compared with little affection for either company. Pinterest sparks an argument capped by an exasperated 'I hate you, Dan.' Printers split opinion, one voice calling them a misery of drivers while another says they mostly just work now. A question about whether the web itself is becoming irrelevant shares space with a thought experiment about simulating the legal process through machine learning, down to fuzzing the laws for edge cases and a juror who missed their morning orange juice. Then there is everything else. The three trade answers on imposter syndrome, songs that make them cry, whether to take the blame in a family argument to keep the peace, and whether to ask before acting in a relationship, illustrated with a story about strict laundry rules. Working from home comes with its own mental overhead, offset in one case by constant access to a SodaStream. Cold opens toss out asides about mattresses with apps and favorite horn noises before the introductions. The register is loose, digressive and frequently profane, full of teasing and trailing admissions of 'I don't know'. It can still turn firm: one closing stretch calls fights over other people's software choices a waste of finite time and tells people to use and advocate for what they like without harassing anyone. What a listener gets is that mix, with considered takes on open source sitting right beside arguments about Pinterest.