A noisy defense of provocation that keeps landing on structure.
This triple feature uses a few films as a way into provocation itself, moving from obscenity debates and explicit art to wrestling shock tactics and Cannibal Corpse covers.

Rowdy criticism for unruly entertainment.
Radulich in Broadcasting treats movies, television seasons, and metal albums as fuel for argument, jokes, and surprisingly serious craft talk. The conversations can wander, but they usually land on structure, tone, performance, theme, or why a work does or does not hold together.
PRESS PLAY
Radulich in Broadcasting is a sprawling review feed for people who like their pop-culture criticism loud, argumentative, and slightly overcaffeinated. It is not locked to one lane. The same umbrella covers film, television seasons, metal albums, courtroom-style movie debates, triple features, and odd thematic groupings that make sense once the panel starts pulling on the thread. Recent episodes jump from Irreversible, Baise Moi, and Trouble Every Day to Happy!, Megadeth, Bulworth, Ready or Not 2, The Pirates of Penzance, De-Lovely, A Prairie Home Companion, Swimming with Sharks, Suicide Kings, and American Psycho. That range matters. The show is at its best when the conversation uses plot as a starting point, then pushes into craft, discomfort, audience reaction, and why a piece either earns its uglier choices or collapses under them. It can be very funny. It can also get pointed. A riff about fictional judges, old animation movement, or a schedule obligation may suddenly become a real argument about pacing, performance, genre expectations, censorship, or emotional stakes. The panel likes movies and television enough to fight with them. That gives the show its texture. It is not polished in a sterile way, and the digressions are part of the engine. A Happy! discussion turns into a comparison between a tight first season and a second season that throws too much into the pot. A Ready or Not 2 review pauses on why an uncomfortable beating scene has to function as a character turn. A triple feature on late-90s American cinema frames power itself as pathology. Even the more chaotic moments tend to circle back to what the work is doing and whether that choice works. The show is blunt about adult material and comfortable around abrasive art, but it is not just shock appreciation. It is a place for listeners who want criticism with jokes, history, argument, and the occasional messy personal aside still attached.
Made for: Best for film, TV, and metal fans who enjoy opinionated panel talk more than polished recap. It especially suits listeners who like genre arguments, uncomfortable art, old pop-culture references, and criticism that can be funny without going weightless.
What sets it apart: The show’s range is unusually wide, moving between transgressive cinema, horror comedy, musical films, political satire, independent film, television seasons, and metal records. Its edge comes from the collision of loose banter with real attention to structure, theme, and audience reaction.
Radulich in Broadcasting has a great reputation for providing tremendous podcast content in the Entertainment world. Now, they bring their myriad of shows to the W2M Network. Prepare for great things from Movie and Metal Music Reviews to Comic Book talk and more. Mark Radulich has been an internet personality since 2004 with his Progressive Conservatism blog. He then took that blog to the airwaves and created a podcast for it. It then changed to PC Live. After that, he brought out the 411mania Ground and Pound Radio as well. Finally, Mark would partner up with another 411mania alum, Sean Comer, to create the movie franchise review podcast Long Road to Ruin and then Robert Cooper to create th…
Based on 6 episodes we listened to · September 2026
Its rotating formats turn movies and television into candid arguments about structure, performance, authorship, and the limits of taste.
Radulich in Broadcasting turns screen criticism into an argument among people willing to show their work. Mark Radulich anchors several formats, including Damn You Hollywood, On Trial, Triple Feature, and TV Party Tonight, moving between new releases, older films, television…
A remake goes on trial, and your nostalgia may need a defense attorney.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A noisy defense of provocation that keeps landing on structure.
This triple feature uses a few films as a way into provocation itself, moving from obscenity debates and explicit art to wrestling shock tactics and Cannibal Corpse covers.
A blunt Happy! discussion that favors season one's tight shape over season two's sprawl.
Happy! is presented as a study in balance, with season one kept lean and purposeful: Nick Sax is still trying to rescue his daughter, and the wild comic-book logic never quite outruns the story's spine.
A loose film discussion lands best when longer lives open onto the harder work of learning how to cope.
The episode uses the movie as a way into the questions its story leaves only partly faced: what might follow if humans could live much longer, and why the film moves past the social upheaval that would come with that change.
A childhood favorite gets a clear-eyed adult rewatch, alive to cartoon motion, long songs, and the post-Modern Major-General dip.
Rattledge and Broadcasting treats Pirates as a childhood favorite put back under adult light, with Mark Rattledge and Shay Tate circling its cartoon physicality, extended songs, and the moment its charge begins to fade.
A loose but pointed read on how one brutal scene makes the movie's villainy stick.
Radulich in Broadcasting treats the movie as a question of audience tolerance: can one scene make viewers stop granting a character any comic goodwill?
A loose remake debate turns into a wider riff on Hulu, Disney, Fox, and movie arguments that wander well.
On Trial puts The Hand that Rocks the Cradle back in the room for the show's familiar kind of movie argument: loose, opinionated, and willing to re-try a film's merits from more than one angle.
A sharp Bulworth discussion tracks Warren Beatty's politics through the film's Aaron Sorkin-shaped writing.
Bulworth lands as a Warren Beatty vehicle with a lot of political self-regard built into the case, and the panel uses that as its way in rather than settling for plot summary.


Mike Muncer and a different guest dissect two horror films per episode, by subgenre.




Mark Radulich and co-host Robert Winfrey put the 1998 Warren Beatty film 'Bulworth' on trial.
Mark Radulich hosts an 'On Trial' episode comparing the 1992 psychological thriller 'The Hand That Rocks the Cradle' to its 2025 Hulu remake.
This episode discusses a triple feature of football-themed films—Varsity Blues, The Program, and Necessary Roughness—as part of a Super Bowl celebration, with Jason as the main selector.
This episode promotes OrderlyMeds.com, a telehealth service offering doctor-guided access to GLP-1 medications like semaglutide and terzepatide for weight loss, with home delivery and privacy features.
This episode satirically critiques Hollywood's culture of fame, scandals, and excess while introducing a podcast focused on the entertainment industry.
A triple feature sets the table.
The episode zeroes in on the show's first two seasons.
The panel digs into a movie's take on humans who can live far longer than usual.
Two hosts discuss Megadeth and their history with the band on their podcast, mentioning past episodes and a missing co-host.
This episode is a comedic trial-style review of the movie Bulworth, featuring fictional judges and humorous commentary.
Mark Rattledge and Shay Tate review three Kevin Kline films for Triple Feature: the 1983 operetta adaptation The Pirates of Penzance, the Cole Porter biopic De-Lovely, and Robert Altman's A Prairie Home Companion.
The host approaches the movie with the distinct feeling that the schedule has forced the issue.
This episode analyzes three late 1990s independent films—Swimming with Sharks, Suicide Kings, and American Psycho—through the theme of power as pathology.
This episode of On Trial is a satirical courtroom-style debate comparing the 1989 film War of the Roses with a hypothetical 2025 version, featuring humorous legal banter and movie analysis.