New Books in Performing Arts is a scholarly interview series about performance as history, method, and cultural evidence. It is built around books. That simple structure gives the show both focus and range, because each conversation starts with a publication and then follows the questions that made the research necessary. The pace is patient. Episodes often begin with an origin story, a key archive, or a framing question, then move outward into the larger claims a book is making. Conversations show how broad the field can be. Daniel Rachel discusses pop music, the swastika, and the Third Reich. Danielle Bainbridge turns to Millie Christine McCoy, enslavement, freak shows, and the problem of reading performance through the archive. John Kuhn’s episode uses early modern England to think about theatrical practice and the category of the pagan. Jessica Clark’s work brings ancient Roman theater and entertainment culture into view. Other episodes take up Yiddish dialect songs of Tin Pan Alley, dance in higher education, women’s dance and parish religion in England, and postcolonialism as a way of reading and teaching. The show is not casual arts chatter. It asks what performance reveals when the evidence is partial, uncomfortable, or historically distant. A dance in sacred space can become a question about gender and religious discipline. A popular song can carry political symbols and social anxieties. A theatrical category can become a sorting device for belief, difference, and empire. The interviews let scholars explain the route from example to argument. That makes the show useful for readers, students, teachers, and curious non-specialists who want access to academic work without losing its complexity. It is especially good at showing how books are made: through archives, revisions, teaching, uncertainty, and sustained attention. The result is a calm, serious guide to performance studies in motion.