Horror Show Hot Dog is a horror review show where the jokes and the judgements arrive in the same breath. Josh, Matt and Charlie watch horror films, argue about them and put scores out of ten on what they saw. The scores are specific. One film gets a five and a half. It had a strong idea and a promising character friction and dropped both, and before long the reviewer has a whole list of why-didn't-yous. The fourth film in a Jason series gets an eight, with credit for good acting, good effects and a score described as Hitchcockian. The same discussion admits to bouncing hard off Feldman but still enjoys the moment he snaps and starts beating an already dead Jason. Character writing gets close attention. One film is mocked for a character who cycles through ex-con, youth pastor, ex-cop and concerned dad. Its best line, a promise to keep searching every day weather permitting, is ribbed for having stricter standards than the post office. Horror logic gets its own rule: if an object turns up somewhere new in a house where the only other person cannot move, leave or call the police. Praise is rationed. A Miyazaki comparison comes with the note that it is never offered lightly, and a market sequence is called astonishing. Another film is judged stylish and mildly entertaining, but with no human parts. Episodes open with Josh and Matt introducing themselves with a gag. One of Josh's is a full song parody about a vampire, another a rhyming verse about brujeria and a cursed toad. Pop-culture asides pile up: Statler and Waldorf, Clueless, Hugh Hefner and Iggy Pop. The tangents wander further still, to a regretted pass on Scream items at a Hollywood prop auction, to young people's slang and gaming culture, and to phones that keep everyone in a state of hypervigilance. Titles like 'Episode 515 – Soulless Acridity', 'Episode 481 – Ennui and the Forest' and 'Episode 517 – The Organ on Weed' show how much the show likes odd, funny labels. A good first listen is 'Episode 513 – There’s No Human Parts', which has both the Miyazaki praise and the verdict it shares a name with. The language is strong and the humor is crude, so this is a poor fit for anyone who wants a tidy critical roundup.