Historical Blindness is a long-form skeptical history podcast about myths that survive because they are useful, eerie, flattering, or politically convenient. It favors argument over banter. Episodes move patiently through sources, context, and contradictions, then ask why a story became persuasive in the first place. The range is broad but coherent. A ghostly episode on the Versailles time-slip becomes a lesson in testimony, false authority, and Occam's razor. A piece on sacred global alignments becomes a critique of pattern-seeking dressed up as ancient science. Religious episodes examine the Gospels, Christ traditions, rapture predictions, alchemical lore, the Lost Tribes, and literalist readings of scripture. Political history sits close to the surface. Recent episodes connect Black history, gun rights, slavery, Nazi persecution, misogyny, and authoritarian rhetoric to the ways historical narratives are edited or suppressed. The show does not treat the past as trivia. It treats it as evidence in an ongoing fight over meaning. The writing is dense, sometimes polemical, and comfortable naming racism, persecution, conspiracy, and propaganda directly. At the same time, its core habit is careful separation of what is claimed, what is documented, and what has merely been repeated. The show is especially strong when a compelling story begins to collapse under chronology, geography, or textual history. It has a teacherly cadence, but not a neutral one. Historical Blindness is for listeners who like history with skepticism, source criticism, and modern stakes rather than cozy nostalgia or supernatural credulity.