And the Runner-Up Is is an Oscar-history show with its attention fixed on the performances that nearly made it, should have made it, or outlived the categories that ignored them. Its recent A Woman Robbed bonus episodes narrow that mission to actresses who missed nominations. The structure is simple and useful. Kevin introduces a theme, brings in a guest with a clear affection for the films at hand, and builds a double feature around two overlooked performances. From there, the conversation moves patiently. A typical episode starts with awards context, then shifts into casting history, campaign momentum, genre bias, and the actual shape of the acting. The show is casual, but it is not loose in the lazy sense. Its best stretches sound like two film people talking through a case from several angles because the first answer is never quite enough. Why did a consensus form so quickly? Why does the Academy still hesitate around sci-fi, horror, action, musicals, or comic work? Why does one performance get treated as prestige while another gets dismissed as too loud, too genre-coded, too strange, or too commercially familiar? Recent episodes make those questions concrete through performers including Danielle Deadwyler, Margot Robbie, Chase Infiniti, Amanda Seyfried, Linda Hamilton, Charlize Theron, Renate Reinsve, Tessa Thompson, Bjork, Amy Adams, Mia Farrow, Meryl Streep, Shelley Duvall, Elizabeth Berkley, Julianne Moore, and Reese Witherspoon. The show also has a strong memory for the surrounding films: Till, Terminator 2 Judgment Day, Hannah and Her Sisters, The Shining, Election, Enchanted, and Dancer in the Dark are treated as more than trivia answers. They become evidence. The tone is warm and evaluative, with room for dry jokes, personal viewing history, and real frustration at awards patterns that keep repeating. It can be funny. It can also turn grave when the material calls for it, especially around racial violence, family trauma, psychological horror, or the toll placed on women in performance and production. What keeps it grounded is the constant return to the acting itself. A nomination may be the hook, but the real question is why a performance works and why people are still arguing for it years later.