A careful look at beauty as daily behavior, not just appearance.
Species starts with a blunt, funny question about how long people spend on their looks, then folds that into a serious study of human behavior.

Evolutionary biology with teeth and wit.
Species uses animals as a way into big evolutionary questions, from lamprey jaws and gibbon songs to beards, beauty, and infidelity. Its episodes move between vivid natural-history scenes, research conversations, and plainspoken arguments about why bodies and behaviors take the forms they do.
PRESS PLAY
Species is a science show about animals, but its real subject is the continuity between human life and the rest of nature. It asks why bodies look the way they do. It asks why behaviors that feel personal, embarrassing, violent, attractive, or morally charged might have evolutionary histories behind them. The show can start with a simple prompt about how much time someone spent on appearance yesterday, then move toward cross-cultural research on beautification. It can begin with Darwin being bothered by a peacock's tail and end up in the debate over beards, facial masculinity, ornaments, shields, and mate choice. It can use lampreys to make deep evolutionary time feel immediate. That range is the point. Species is at its best when it refuses to keep humans in a separate category from ducks, rabbits, snails, gibbons, bears, and every other animal with a body shaped by selection. The tone is quick, literate, and often wry. It likes a strong opening image. It also likes specificity, whether that means an ancient legal code, a remote mining compound, or the daily schedule of singing apes. Some episodes are narrated essays with a tightly argued evolutionary question. Others are research conversations, with guests such as Dr. Marta Kowal on beauty, Dr. Susan Cheyne on gibbons, and Dr. Barnaby Dixson on facial hair. The show does not flatten science into trivia. It follows mechanisms, competing explanations, and the limits of the evidence. That makes its human-behavior episodes especially distinctive, because subjects such as infidelity, sexual variety, body image, and male violence are handled as biological puzzles rather than simple provocations. The animal episodes bring equal force, especially when conservation, captivity, food sources, and human pressure on habitats enter the frame. Species can be funny, but the humor usually sits beside real intellectual pressure. It is accessible without being thin. It is blunt without being careless. For listeners who want evolutionary biology with narrative momentum, moral complexity, and a long view of animal life, Species offers a smart, restless route through the living world.
Made for: For curious listeners who like animal behavior, human nature, and science stories that move from everyday habits to deep evolutionary time. It especially suits people who enjoy clear explanations of messy subjects such as beauty, mating, violence, and conservation.
What sets it apart: Species connects natural history and human behavior without treating people as separate from the animal world. Its strength is the jump from vivid scene-setting to evolutionary argument, with enough research texture to keep the conclusions from feeling too neat.
"The host, Macken Murphy, is able to condense vast chunks of information into engaging and digestible episodes. Fact-filled and fun." — The New York Times
Based on 5 episodes we listened to · September 2026
Species turns provocative questions about animals and humans into careful evolutionary arguments that leave room for uncertainty.
Species starts with a provocation, builds an evolutionary frame around it, then lets research complicate the first answer. Macken Murphy moves between authored explanation and extended interviews, applying the same questioning habit to facial hair, beauty practices, gibbon…
A peacock's tail leads straight to your beard, if evolutionary detours are your favorite route.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A careful look at beauty as daily behavior, not just appearance.
Species starts with a blunt, funny question about how long people spend on their looks, then folds that into a serious study of human behavior.
An ancient law code opens a sharp, layered look at why infidelity persists.
The episode opens with the Code of Uru-Namu and its fixed penalties for murder, robbery, broken limbs, and teeth, then uses that severity to frame infidelity as a question with evolutionary stakes.
A gibbon-focused conversation that turns human exceptionalism into a conservation argument.
The episode builds around a sharper claim than it first appears: calling violence, meat-eating, infidelity, or similar behavior natural only when humans do it exposes how often people set themselves apart from the rest of nature.
A peacock tail leads to beards, mate choice, and the logic of ornament.
Species opens with Darwin's peacock problem and uses it to frame sexual selection: how a trait that seems costly to survival can persist if peahens favor it.

Steven Novella and a rotating panel dissect weekly science news and debunk pseudoscience claims.





A narrative about a bear attack in Kamchatka, exploring the ecological causes and consequences.
This episode explores the evolutionary history of jaws, tracing back over 400 million years to the first vertebrates.
This episode investigates the evolutionary reasons for beards, weighing hypotheses of protection in combat versus sexual selection.
Marta Kowal says 93-country data found people spend 231 minutes a day on beauty.
["Species opens with the 4,000-year-old Code of Ur-Namu from modern-day Iraq, where murder and robbery bring death and a shattered limb costs a mina of silver.", "Macken Murphy then cites a 39-nation Pew Research survey, a 98%/80% fantasy study, and his estimate that at least one-fourth of Western marriages experience infidelity.", "He moves through monogamy trade-offs in birds, fish, lizards, and termites, plus a 254-person sample of affair motives that includes revenge, supplemental investment, and information-seeking.", "The episode sets up a pre-registered comparison of dual mating versus mate switching by asking whether affair partners or primary partners rate higher on mate value, attractiveness, and co-parenting value."]
Species opens with an argument that asking whether violence, meat-eating, or infidelity is "natural" assumes humans sit outside the rest of nature.
Species opens with Darwin's peacock-tail problem and asks why a costly human trait like a beard exists when chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas lack one.
Species examines incel identity and romantic exclusion through an interview with evolutionary psychologist William Costello, a researcher mentored by David Buss.
Alexander, the grad student behind @DatePsych and DatePsychology.com, cites dating-app research in which adding a master's degree to a man's bio increased swipes, while the same information for women had "basically no effect." He puts the sex difference in sociosexuality at roughly a standard deviation (Cohen's d about 0.9) and points to the Clark and Hatfield campus experiment, where many men but no women accepted sex offers from attractive strangers.
This episode explores the fascinating mutualistic relationship between the greater honeyguide bird and humans, describing how the bird leads people to beehives in exchange for access to honey.