Sasquatch Tracks belongs to cryptozoology, but its real subject is evidence: what it looks like, who gathered it and how much weight it can bear. Recent episodes carry a montage of Bigfoot soundbites that plays out the central standoff in miniature. One voice says film would be proof, then concedes that scientists want a piece of the body and will accept nothing else. Another answers that there are ways to prove something exists without killing it. That tension hangs over much of what follows. Some of it is frankly numerical. 'The Sasquatch Data Project' features someone who has worked through more than 1,600 reports and logs over 150 physical, environmental and behavioral traits, down to nose structure, chest depth and whether anything was thrown. Witness traits such as fear level go into the record too, along with categories like a sighting at more than 300 feet or a road crossing. Most reports, the speaker admits, come down to someone who simply saw the animal. Physical traces get the same scrutiny. In 'David Zigan: Bigfoot Forensics', the speaker describes prints believed to be bear tracks manipulated to look like footprints. That finding grew into a separate study of bear paw pads, documented with help from seven zoos and several sanctuaries, by someone who admits to an unnatural fear of bears. Together with 'Scott Tompkins: The Bigfoot Mapping Project', these titles sketch a show that treats Bigfoot as a records problem as much as a legend. The show also looks beyond Sasquatch. In 'Adrian Shine: A Natural History of Sea Serpents', the leatherback turtle is put forward as a candidate for the beginnings of the New England sea serpent. The wake does the rest: a displacement wake spreads at an angle of almost 39 degrees, and seen from the side at low angles its wavelets form a row of inky black humps, exactly what an observer would take for a body. 'Historical Hominoids: Relicts From the Past' turns to the Tornit, figures from legends collected by Franz Boas and other anthropologists, said to dress in skins and to warm food by laying it on their legs. Rather than retrofit them into Sasquatch, the speaker finds the descriptions closer to archaic humans like Neanderthals. The same habit of drawing lines runs through 'Remembering Jeff Meldrum and Jane Goodall'. There, Meldrum's book is recalled as genuinely academic and his conjectures as scientifically based rather than wild, backed by evidence he collected himself and gathered from others. The talk is conversational and leaves room for personal asides, but it keeps coming back to what a claim can carry. Closings name Micah Hanks, Jeff Smith and Dakota Waddell, mention researchers at the Appalachian Institute for Hominology Studies and end on the same promise that Sasquatch Tracks will return. A newcomer curious about the method could begin with 'The Sasquatch Data Project', where it is laid out most plainly.