Psychology for real-life connection.
Psychologists Off the Clock is a measured psychology show where research is translated into ordinary life. Recent conversations move from college pressure and disagreement to guilt, overwhelm, body decisions, love, and the small risks that make people feel closer.
PRESS PLAY
Psychologists Off the Clock is a warm, conversation-centered psychology show about the places research meets ordinary life. It is careful without feeling cold. Across recent episodes, the conversations move through college pressure, confidence, guilt, disagreement, overwhelm, weight loss, love, and self-disclosure. The common thread is practical meaning: what a psychological idea changes in a real conversation, a stressful school year, or a moment of emotional friction. The show often begins with a plain question and then circles patiently around the answer. It gives room for nuance. Ana Homayoun’s episode frames college success around resisting comparison culture and helping students build a blueprint from their own interests, skills, strengths, and growth areas. Michael Herold’s confidence conversation treats fear and discomfort as passengers, not stop signs. Chris Moore’s episode on guilt argues that a painful feeling can still point toward care for relationships. Julia Minson’s disagreement episode shifts attention away from persuading the other person and toward what happens when both sides enter convinced they are right. Kerry Makin-Byrd’s overwhelm discussion looks for signals in sleep, eating, mood, and the feeling of no longer acting like oneself. Jill Stoddard’s weight-loss conversation centers adults’ right to make body decisions with support rather than scrutiny. Sonja Lyubomirsky and Harry Reis bring the love conversation down to care, warmth, authenticity, and listening mindsets. Leslie John’s episode on oversharing explores disclosure as a social risk that can build trust when handled well. The show’s best moments are not flashy. They are clarifying. A research finding becomes a relationship example; a familiar emotion gets renamed as information; a broad concept turns into one slightly better way to listen, ask, pause, or respond. It fits listeners who want psychology that is humane, evidence-minded, and applicable without being reduced to checklist advice.
Made for: For listeners who want thoughtful psychology conversations about relationships, confidence, health, and emotional habits. It especially suits people who like research explained through everyday situations rather than dense academic language.
What sets it apart: The show stands out for its patient, relational style: ideas are repeated, tested against lived examples, and brought back to practical implications. It feels less like advice dispensing and more like a guided conversation about what human behavior means in context.
We are five experts in psychology, bringing you science-backed ideas that can help you flourish in your work, relationships, and health.
Based on 5 episodes we listened to · September 2026
Psychologists Off the Clock makes research on anxiety, trust and connection usable by following psychological ideas into ordinary relationships and bodily reactions.
Psychologists Off the Clock turns psychological ideas into close readings of how people connect, protect themselves and make sense of their reactions.
Hostage negotiation meets the knot in your stomach, and both sharpen how you read a room.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A grounded, research-minded conversation on why connection matters and how attentive listening can make intimacy feel more genuine.
This Psychologists Off the Clock episode with Sonia Lubomirsky and Harry Reese looks at a simple but useful idea: happiness practices may help because they leave people feeling more connected to, and loved by, others. The conversation gives that feeling a clear shape.
A thoughtful look at disclosure, follow-up questions, and the small social risks that can make connection easier.
Sensitive disclosure gives this episode its center of gravity: the idea that opening up can feel risky, but may also invite trust in return. From there, the conversation turns practical, looking at how follow-up questions show attention, how curiosity across different topics can…
A grounded look at how fawning can turn attention toward others into distance from the self.
Fawning comes through as a pattern of intense outward attention: reading another person's mood, watching for changes, and gradually losing touch with the body's own cues. The connection to anxiety is especially useful.
A warm reflection on purpose, flexible strengths, and the people who help vision become workable.
Purpose comes into focus through a simple but useful question: which spaces make a person feel fully alive, and which activities bring a clear spark of energy?
Gary frames negotiation as calm, sincere listening shaped by empathy and judgment.
Psychologists Off the Clock follows Gary as he frames negotiation less as a contest and more as a disciplined way of showing up with steadiness, sincerity, and curiosity about the other person.
APA's Kim Mills interviews psychology researchers on tipping, crying, and extremism.
Psychologists Off the Clock hosts interview Gary Noesner, former chief of the FBI Crisis Negotiation Unit.
Zorana Ivcevic Pringle discusses how creativity extends beyond the arts to include original and effective solutions in everyday life.
A psychologist discusses the normal function of anxiety and shares a personal story about her daughter's period stress, sponsored by KT period undies.
A discussion with Olga Khazan about how changing your personality can lead to greater happiness and well-being, based on psychological research.
Dr.
Jules Bindy says she spoke publicly about Harvey Weinstein in 2020 partly to give other women courage, while Jill Stoddard introduces her new podcast, We the Sunlight.
Ana Homayoun discusses helping students develop their own blueprint for success by focusing on their interests, skills, and strengths rather than comparing themselves to others.
A psychologist discusses building confidence and managing anxiety, with a sponsor segment about period underwear for teens.
Dalhousie University psychologist Chris Moore tells Psychologists Off the Clock that guilt is "good for us" because it signals harm to a relationship we care about.
Julia Minson, a Harvard Kennedy School professor and author of 'How to Disagree Better', defines a constructive disagreement as 'any disagreement that increases the party's willingness to talk to each other again.' She traces her interest in conflict to ballroom dancing, where partners facing each other 'see your performance and whose fault the various errors are wildly differently.' She uses Lee Ross's concept of naive realism to explain why both sides in a dispute assume 'I get it,' and why her receptiveness scale, built with Francis Chen, did not predict how partners rated each other's behavior in lab conversations.
A psychologist discusses signs of overwhelm and burnout, preceded by an ad for period underwear.
Jill Stoddard discusses life after weight loss and body acceptance on Psychologists Off the Clock.
Sonia Lubomirsky and Harry Reis argue on Psychologists Off the Clock that many happiness interventions work because they make people feel connected to and loved by others.
Leslie John argues on Psychologists Off the Clock that oversharing is often a trust signal, not just a social mistake, and she ties that claim to studies on dating, hiring, and disclosure.
Psychologists Off the Clock interviews Dr.
Ash Brandin discusses how societal blame on technology and individuals overlooks systemic issues like lack of paid parental leave and child care.