A skeptical look at mentalism claims and the pop-psychology pitch around them.
The episode pairs Stevie Baskin with a skeptical look at meta-deception, mentalism, and the kind of self-help certainty that can sound polished while saying very little.

Christopher Kavanagh and Matthew Browne
268 episodes listed below
Dry skepticism for oversized public ideas.
Decoding the Gurus is a skeptical conversation about influential thinkers, mentalists, academics, and online narratives. It moves from loose banter into careful argument, asking what the claim is, what supports it, and where the performance begins.
PRESS PLAY
Decoding the Gurus is a skeptical, academically minded conversation about the people and ideas that gather authority online. It is funny, but not loose in the way a purely comic show is loose. The jokes usually circle back to a question: what is being claimed, what would count as evidence, and how much of the authority comes from presentation rather than substance? Recent episodes show the range. Ian McGilchrist's right-brain framework becomes an occasion to test sweeping claims. A conversation with Stevie Baskin turns mentalism into a case study in performance, persuasion, and the sale of everyday mind-reading confidence. Supplementary episodes move through conspiracy narratives, AI prompt bravado, Grok, Triggernometry prophecies, and the way Reddit or media discourse can turn thin evidence into a satisfying theory. The show also makes room for academic disputes. Michael Inslicht appears for a debate about AI, meaningful work, effort, research practice, and the risk of producing polished slop faster. Andrew Przybylski appears in a Decoding Academia episode about moral entrepreneurs, measurement problems, screen time research, and how suspicion can attach itself to researchers working near unpopular industries. The recurring Guometer format gives guru-like figures a score across repeated traits, with Teal Swan and Scott Galloway handled as a deliberately odd double bill. Episodes on Blindboy show the program's habit of granting partial credit while still correcting overreach. That balance matters. Decoding the Gurus is not reverent toward intellectual celebrity, but it is usually more interested in mechanism than mockery. It notices charisma, incentives, storytelling, grievance, and institutional suspicion, then asks whether the argument survives once those elements are separated. The result is a show for people who like their skepticism conversational, dry, and willing to do the homework.
Made for: For listeners who enjoy critical analysis of gurus, media claims, academic disputes, conspiracy thinking, and internet intellectual culture. It works best for people who like jokes, caveats, and evidence weighed in the same conversation.
What sets it apart: Decoding the Gurus pairs casual banter with sustained argumentative parsing, so inflated claims are made plain before they are judged. Its recurring Gurometer and interview editions give the criticism both structure and room for disagreement.
An exiled Northern Irish anthropologist and a hitchhiking Australian psychologist take a close look at the contemporary crop of 'secular gurus', iconoclasts, and other exiles from the mainstream, offering their own brands of unique takes and special insights. Leveraging two of the most diverse accents in modern podcasting, Chris and Matt dig deep into the claims, peek behind the psychological curtains, and try to figure out once and for all... What's it all About? Join us, as we try to puzzle our way through and talk some smart-sounding smack about the intellectual giants of our age, from Jordan Peterson to...
Based on 6 episodes we listened to · September 2026
Decoding the Gurus shows how expertise, persuasion and commercial incentives combine to turn public claims into marketable authority.
Decoding the Gurus treats public authority as something built, marketed and defended. Matt Brown and Chris Kavanagh examine claims in detail, question the stories surrounding them and keep an eye on the incentives behind online influence.
A guru claim enters; Chris and Matt check its evidence before you rent it space in your head.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A skeptical look at mentalism claims and the pop-psychology pitch around them.
The episode pairs Stevie Baskin with a skeptical look at meta-deception, mentalism, and the kind of self-help certainty that can sound polished while saying very little.
A modest podcast conspiracy is measured against Reddit logic, antisemitic claims, and a supposed mysterious pickleball death.
Decoding the Gurus' supplementary edition treats a conspiracy theory about the show as a compact lesson in scale, suspicion, and online overreach.
A practical AI conversation about meaningful effort, supervision-heavy work, and what still matters when the machine handles the tedious parts.
The discussion keeps its feet on the ground, treating AI as a lens on meaningful effort, cognitive dissonance, and the way coding and research are moving from typing toward supervision.
A dry drift from scheduling jokes into AI rules, conspiracy belief, and the economics of Patreon support.
Supplementary Material Edition turns a scheduling grumble between cognitive anthropologist Christopher Kavanaugh and psychologist-statistician Matthew Brown into a compact look at how authority gets dressed up and passed along.
A dry, skeptical look at Irish immigration, racism, and the stories people tell themselves.
This episode begins in loose, joking banter before shifting into a harder look at historical claims about Irish immigration, gang culture, and racial violence in 19th-century America.
A careful discussion of research, incentives, and the gap between what the data shows and what people say it means.
Decoding the Gurus takes a familiar argument and makes it feel a little more exact. Matthew Brown and Christopher Kavanagh keep the mood loose, but they keep circling back to the same useful question: what does the research actually show, and where do the bigger claims outrun it?
A brisk, skeptical tour of the manosphere and the ideas it smuggles into everyday talk.
The episode makes Decoding the Gurus feel grounded and concrete, using James Bloodworth's visit to trace the manosphere from pickup artists and incels to the political scene that gathers around them.

APA's Kim Mills interviews psychology researchers on tipping, crying, and extremism.





An anthropologist and a psychologist analyze the ideas of Ian McGilchrist, discussing brain hemispheres and his intellectual influence.
Stevie Baskin comes in after a five-hour YouTube splash.
Cold, low-pressure shower talk opens things.
Michael Inzlicht returns for another conversation about AI.
This episode of Decoding the Guru applies the Gurometer scoring system to analyze and compare public figures Teal Swan and Scott Galloway across eleven factors.
Decoding the Gurus hosts Christopher Kavanaugh and Matthew Brown examine three internet phenomena in a supplementary episode: Eric Weinstein publicly bullying the Grok AI into validating his Geometric Unity theory on X.com, a new empirical paper identifying the specific neurons responsible for LLM hallucinations, and the rapid proliferation of Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theories across the political spectrum.
The hosts open with a running joke about solar power and carbon offsets before the chat settles into a sharper back-and-forth.
Matthew Brown and Christopher Kavanagh open on a deliberately academic edition of the show.
Hosts Chris and Matt discuss a mic-drop moment by Obama and analyze cultural figures.
The hosts discuss a recent article debunking the classic psychology book 'When Prophecy Fails'.
The hosts return for a new year of decoding academia, discussing a recent paper and the perils of academic specialization.
Chris and Matt interview two physics PhDs about their work and perspectives, as part of their ongoing series analyzing secular gurus.
The hosts discuss current geopolitical chaos caused by Trump and MAGA, focusing on discourse and cultural analysis.
Two academics discuss their analysis of contemporary secular gurus and iconoclasts, starting with a casual banter about being sick.
The hosts introduce a special episode with guest Helen Lewis, discussing her work and their annual tradition.
In this supplementary episode, hosts Chris and Matt casually discuss recent guru activities and personal updates, including Matt's excitement about a new local pool complex.
Chris and Matt discuss and critique Stefan Molyneux's arguments against God, highlighting his lack of rigor.
Chris and Matt discuss feedback on their episode about controversial guru Stefan Molyneux and promote bonus content.
An academic interview discussing a paper that exposes conceptual and methodological flaws in research linking the gut microbiome to autism.
This episode features an interview with Alexander Beiner discussing sensemaking, including mutual criticisms between the hosts and guest about their approaches to the topic.
The hosts introduce a supplementary podcast where they discuss secular gurus and related topics in a casual, free-form style.
The hosts of Decoding the Gurus introduce a guest decoder, Al Murray, known for his World War Two podcast, to discuss topics related to Nazis and gurus.
This episode features an interview with biochemist Philipp Markolin about his book 'Lab Leak Fever,' exploring the discourse and scientific perspectives on whether COVID-19 originated from a lab or natural sources.
Two academics humorously critique secular gurus and cultural figures, blending analysis with banter.
Chris and Matt introduce their supplementary podcast, discussing their roles and the schism in their Patreon community.
The hosts discuss their podcast's purpose and engage in playful banter about one host's sleepiness and age.
The hosts introduce themselves and engage in playful banter about geeky references, setting the tone for their analysis of contemporary gurus.
The hosts welcome James Bloodworth for a conversation about the manosphere.
Two academics discuss their recent presentation and banter about audience reactions, setting up their analysis of contemporary gurus.
Two academics humorously analyze contemporary secular gurus and their cultural impact.
The hosts banter about a squeaky chair before diving into analysis of contemporary secular gurus.