My Weird Prompts is an AI-generated technology show that turns Daniel's prompts into staged conversations about software, infrastructure, and the politics of AI. Its frame is intentionally odd: a curious human, a sloth, and a donkey form the recurring setup. The wrapper is playful. The substance is often dense. Excerpts move from the UK's Sovereign AI Fund into questions of compute access, startup funding, visas, model training costs, Gulf infrastructure bets, and European AI initiatives. Another thread follows engineering memory through architectural decision records, with attention to status fields, trade-offs, consequences, and the difference between design documents and records of choice. The software episodes get especially concrete. Semantic versioning becomes a way to talk about trust between maintainers and downstream developers. Changelogs become evidence. Yanked releases, major version bumps, conventional commits, and security notes are treated as communication systems, not clerical chores. The agent-focused episodes push that same concern into newer territory: YAML skill files, front matter, modularity, Docker-manager examples, Git worktrees, locks, orchestrators, worker models, incremental CI, and the limits of merely asking agents to behave carefully. My Weird Prompts is not a conventional expert interview show in the provided evidence. It reads more like generated dialogue arranged to chase one technical question until the moving parts are visible. The tone can lurch from comic exaggeration to crisp systems thinking, sometimes in the same excerpt. It also repeatedly discloses its AI production and tells the audience to verify facts. That caveat matters. The show works best as a prompt-driven map of current engineering anxieties: how decisions persist, how releases communicate risk, how AI needs infrastructure, and how toolchains bend when autonomous agents enter the repository. It is strange by design, but the recurring payoff is practical clarity.