Infectious Questions is an NCCID public health show built around practical infectious disease questions and the institutions that answer them. It is technical without being sealed off from real-world consequences. Recent Mod4PH Research Highlights episodes focus on AI, data science, and mathematical modeling for public health use. Wendy Sia speaks with Dr. Jude Kong about the Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Modeling Lab, its framework, and its work on public health questions. Other AIMM Lab conversations bring in modeling of human behavior, privacy-preserving technologies, AI governance, air quality, healthcare, and disease surveillance. The show is especially interested in how data becomes action. Early warning systems, unconventional data, respiratory infections, community signals, and policymaker-facing dashboards all appear as part of that thread. The series also treats community context as more than a footnote. Discussions of co-creation, participatory workshops, low-resource settings, pastoralist communities, border areas, and locally trusted tools give the research a grounded public health frame. A separate Voices of Sovereignty series, presented with Chiefs of Ontario, shifts the emphasis to First Nations data sovereignty. Those episodes discuss community mandates, grassroots initiatives, research ethics boards, privacy laws, data sharing agreements, and the role of governments holding First Nations data. The show’s range is wider than lab science. Its public health perspective on shelters mini-series addresses gender-based and intimate partner violence, domestic violence shelters, LGBTQ services, mental health, addiction, parenting, and barriers to disclosure. That breadth gives Infectious Questions its shape. It is not a general medical chat show, and it is not a headlines show. It is closer to a working public health notebook: researchers, policy staff, and community-facing practitioners explaining how infectious disease response depends on models, data rights, trust, services, and governance. The pacing is measured. The language is professional. The strongest episodes make technical systems legible by tying them to communities that have to live with the results.