A careful look at how teacher framing shapes classroom thinking.
Marguerite E. Walsh and Jeff Green center this conversation on a demanding teaching problem: how expertise keeps developing after a teacher's degree or certificate.
50 episodes listed below
Educational psychology research, explained by the people who wrote it.
On this APA Division 15 series, host Jeff Green talks with the scholars behind one article or practice brief at a time. The subjects run from teacher expertise and problem-solving instruction to racial bias in quantitative methods, and each conversation stays tied to the authors' own writing.
PRESS PLAY
Emerging Research in Educational Psychology is the podcast series of the American Psychological Association's Division 15. The idea is simple: take one article or practice brief and talk it through with the people who wrote it. Jeff Green hosts. He has said on air that he would rather keep the focus on his guests and their scholarship than on himself. Even so, he often opens with a short reflection of his own, and those openings are worth hearing. Some are serious, like a reminder of how much teachers must know, or the point that no method can take the human element out of human activity, quantitative research included. Others are lighter. One begins with him admitting that he loves Hawaiian pizza and expects pushback for saying so. Then the talk turns to the paper, and it stays there. With Marguerite E. Walsh, the subject is teacher learning and adaptive expertise. The discussion covers how the way a teacher frames a lesson shapes what happens in it, from open-ended questions to pressing students to explain their reasoning. Wendy Castillo and Sarah Gillborn take on quantitative methods. Their points are that people make the categories, and that defaulting to a white comparison group treats one group as the norm. The alternatives they discuss include a universal target and analyzing differences within groups. Terrell R. Morton, Whitney N. McCoy, and ReAnna S. Roby talk about BGEM, a theory about Black girls and motivation. One of its ideas, embodied decisions, holds that choosing to speak up in class, to disengage, or to persist is something lived in the body, not just reasoned out in the head. Dionne Cross Francis and Francesca López, who edited a special issue, discuss worldview and reflexivity. They explain why questions about the nature of knowledge matter to anyone doing inquiry, not only to qualitative researchers. That episode opens with Green reading from the APA's October 29, 2021 resolution, which apologized to people of color for the association's role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism. Christina Barbieri and Jessica Rodrigues describe combining explicit modeling of problem-solving steps with worked examples, both correct and incorrect, plus immediate corrective feedback, while taking care not to overload working memory. Sara Rimm-Kaufman and Krystal Thomas discuss their 2021 practice brief, 'How White Middle-Class Teachers Can Apply Psychology to Teach Students Who Are Different from Them.' Two threads keep coming back across these conversations: what teachers need to know and do, and how race shapes both schooling and the research that studies it. The tone is collegial and exact, and guests get room to lay out their reasoning. Since the titles are just the guests' names, the easiest way in is to pick the question closest to hand, such as classroom dialogue, quantitative methods, motivation, or teaching across difference, and start with the researchers who wrote about it.
Made for: Suits a teacher, graduate student, or education researcher who wants to hear the thinking behind a specific article or practice brief. The subjects range from classroom dialogue and problem-solving instruction to race and bias in research methods.
What sets it apart: Each episode is built around one piece of scholarship and features the people who wrote it, often after a short personal reflection from host Jeff Green. Race, in both teaching and research methods, comes up repeatedly across the run.
Podcast by APA Division 15
Based on 5 episodes we listened to · September 2026
It makes the hidden choices in educational research visible, then traces how those choices shape theory, interpretation, and classroom practice.
Jeff Green builds each conversation around a recent research paper, then keeps asking how its concepts change the way educational psychology is practiced.
Hawaiian pizza is Jeff Green's doorway into math instruction; your lesson plan might follow.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A careful look at how teacher framing shapes classroom thinking.
Marguerite E. Walsh and Jeff Green center this conversation on a demanding teaching problem: how expertise keeps developing after a teacher's degree or certificate.
A concise case for treating quantitative methods as human, biased, and worth critical reflection.
Jeff Green and his guests make a clear case that quantitative methods are not somehow free of bias or racism, because the questions, categories, reporting choices, and interpretations behind them are all made by people.
A theory-building conversation that treats Black girls' motivation as lived, embodied, and daily.
Jeff Green's conversation with Whitney McCoy-Hudson, Terrell R. Morton, and ReAnna S. Roby centers Black girl embodied motivation, a framework asking how educational psychology might better account for Black girls' motivation.
A focused conversation about race-focused research, inquiry worldviews, and the ethics of educational psychology.
Jeff Green centers this APA Division 15 conversation on the APA Council of Representatives' October 29, 2021 resolution, which apologized to people of color and recognized that psychology had not consistently supported research on communities of color by reporting and including…
A practical conversation about cognitive load, worked examples, and math support that stays grounded.
The episode opens with a Hawaiian pizza comparison before moving into a paper on blending cognitive load theory with research on supporting students with mathematics difficulties.

APA's Kim Mills interviews psychology researchers on tipping, crying, and extremism.

Everyday behavior, examined one awkward question at a time.




Dr.
Jeff Green frames Wendy Castillo and Sarah Gilborn's 2025 Educational Psychologist article around the claim that quantitative methods are human activities, not neutral machines.
Jeff Green interviews Terrell R.
Jeff Green opens with the APA Council of Representatives' October 29, 2021 apology to people of color for the APA's role in racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in the United States.
["Jeff Green opens the APA Division 15 podcast by comparing cognitive load theory to Hawaiian pizza and framing Christina Arizaga-Babieri and Jessica Rodriguez's 2025 Educational Psychologist article on supporting students with mathematics difficulty.", "Rodriguez says 3% to 6.5% of school-aged students have a diagnosed mathematics learning disability, and 2024 NAEP results show 84% of U.S.
Samantha Daly's 2025 article applies Universal Design for Learning to educational psychology research on students with disabilities.
Ben Heddy and Alyssa Emery’s 2025 article proposes transdisciplinary inclusivity to improve educational psychology research with students with disabilities.
Jeff Vomund's 2025 Educational Psychologist article frames adaptive teacher empathy as a process that begins with understanding students' perspectives.
An interview with education researchers about their practice brief on how white middle-class teachers can apply psychology to teach diverse students.
Interview with Nikki Lobczowski about her research on designing learning technologies to improve collaborative learning and group-level regulation.
Allison Zengilowski and Brendan Schuetze discuss their critical review of refutation text literature, highlighting methodological confounds and theoretical problems in research on correcting misconceptions.
An interview with professors Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer about their research on epistemic cognition, attitude change, and learning.
Interview with Dr.