#AuditTuesday GRC Podcast is a practical GRC and identity-security show centered on risk as it appears in daily operations. It is less interested in polished theory than in the work of proving, reviewing, hiring, and correcting. Recent conversations move across GRC careers, identity risk assessments, DORA audits, AI governance, and Microsoft file sharing. The throughline is access. Who has it, who should have it, how evidence is produced, and what happens when policy outruns the tools available to enforce it. Episodes often begin with a timely board-level or audit-level concern, then bring it down to the level of stale accounts, admin reviews, external file links, segregation of duties, and hiring-manager expectations. The show is brisk, technical, and usually interview-driven. It gives guests room to explain their background, but keeps returning to the operational question. What does the company need to know, document, monitor, or fix? The GRC recruiting episode with Pete Strauss looks past certification lists and toward experience, communication skills, and the problem of training entry-level talent. The identity-risk discussion with Neil Chapman, Ph.D., focuses on privilege creep, access reviews, and the danger of writing policies that the organization cannot actually execute. The DORA episode with Ralf Menegatti treats digital resilience as a broad control environment, where access evidence and regulatory scrutiny reach beyond IT administration. The AI governance panel frames regulation, readiness, compute, and risk management as audit and leadership concerns rather than hype-cycle talking points. The Microsoft file-sharing conversation with Alan Sugano is especially concrete, zeroing in on external links, anonymous access, and missing expiration dates across OneDrive, Teams, and SharePoint. The show can sound like a live industry session, complete with product mentions and contact details. Its value is in the working examples. For compliance professionals, security leaders, auditors, and GRC job seekers, it provides a clear view of the questions that come up before audits, after incidents, and during hiring conversations. It is practical, specific, and more useful when the listener wants the operational consequences than when the listener wants a formal lecture.