Ugh, As If! - contemporary art and culture podcast · Lisa Fevral

Sabrina's nonsense album cover(and Sydney Sweeney while we at it)-4x02

·1 hr 3 min·4 clips

They say Sabrina Carpenter’s recent performances make this cover feel centered on men, not on her own desire.

1. Ugh, As If! spends this episode on Sabrina Carpenter’s "Man's Best Friend" album cover and the argument around Sydney Sweeney. 2. The hosts, who speak as artists and visual-culture readers, matter because they frame the debate through art history, feminism, and image analysis. 3. The episode asks whether the cover is satire, irony, or just poorly executed sexual imagery. 4. They start by saying the discourse around the cover is tired and that the concept itself is "late by a couple centuries." 5. They connect queer sexual imagery in the 1980s AIDS crisis to the fact that sex was already politicized for queer people. 6. They argue that "irony" is being used loosely and that the cover fits satire more than irony. 7. They define satire as humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule used to expose stupidity or vices. 8. They say the cover’s visual treatment feels bland rather than conceptually sharp. 9. They criticize the image for leaning on familiar BDSM and sex-toy tropes that have been overused in contemporary art. 10. They argue the framing does not convincingly subvert male power because the man is clothed and still present as a person. 11. They say the image would have landed differently if the man had been naked or if Sabrina had held something like a knife to reverse the power dynamic. 12. They bring up Sabrina Carpenter’s recent performances and lyrics, including references to men, "Juno" poses, and lines from "Espresso." 13. They argue that her public persona keeps centering male pleasure, so the album art does not read as a clean statement about her own desire. 14. They compare the cover to Linda Benglis’s 1974 photo series "Now," especially the image with a realistic strap-on. 15. They say Benglis’s work works because it unsettles gender stereotypes and can "never be one thing." 16. They also compare this rollout to the Irene and Seulgi "Oyster" image and say the involvement of lesbian women in the visuals changed how that project read. 17. The tone is argumentative, lecture-like, and full of quick corrections between the two hosts. 18. The format moves like a two-person debate, with interruptions, examples, and long explanatory stretches. 19. Best for listeners who like pop-culture criticism and art-school frameworks. 20. Skip if you want celebrity gossip without visual-analysis jargon.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Ugh, As If! - contemporary art and culture podcast