Side Affects Episode 134 | Empowering Employers: Pros and Cons of Self-Funded Health Plans

April 22, 2024·35 min·2 clips

Kenzie McEvely opens the show with Tim Rieger, a longtime MB consultant who has been with the company for nearly 22 years and focuses on financial results, risk management and stratification, and first-class customer service. Dave Homan joins the conversation. The episode centers on self-funded insurance plans and the employers that may be a good fit. Tim explains the model in practical terms. He keeps coming back to financial results, risk management, and the kind of service employers need when the stakes are real. The conversation treats self-funding as a serious operating choice, not a trendy label. The group walks through the common questions people bring to this topic. They look at the pros and the cons. They also talk about how much more intentional an employer has to be once the plan is self-funded. A major section of the discussion focuses on the SPD, the plan document that sets the rules for how claims are handled. The show explains why that document matters so much once the plan is live. Tim warns that the stop-loss language has to mirror the SPD. That point is not theoretical. If the two documents do not line up, a claim can fall outside the stop-loss protection the employer thought it had. In that case, the employer may be left holding the liability. The episode also slows down for the unglamorous side of the decision. Tim talks about due diligence. He stresses that proposals are easy to get, but contracts still need to be read carefully. The team spends time on the exit question too. What happens if the employer's situation changes three or four years later? What if the plan is not producing the result the employer expected? Those questions come up before any good self-funded setup gets a green light. Tim pushes for an exit strategy from the start. He also talks about reserves and making sure the accounting is set up properly. The message is simple. Do not create surprises on the tail end. The ramp-up period gets its own attention. Tim says the transition can take 6 to 12 months, and preferably closer to 15. That timeline matters because self-funding needs more engagement than a plan that can coast on autopilot. The episode contrasts that reality with fully insured plans, hybrids, and captives. Those arrangements can feel easier to manage day to day. Self-funding asks for more ongoing attention. The tone stays warm and conversational throughout. Kenzie asks the kind of practical follow-ups a curious non-expert would ask. Dave helps translate the moving parts without flattening the complexity. The discussion is especially useful because it never pretends the details are optional. The language stays plainspoken. The examples stay anchored in workplace reality. By the end, the episode makes a clear case for careful planning. It also makes clear that self-funding can work, but only when the employer understands what it is signing up for. The final note is one of experience, patience, and disciplined follow-through.

As heard by us

Self-funding can be a smart move, but only if the contracts, reserves, and exit plan are handled with care.

Self-funded health plans are treated as a serious option here, but the discussion keeps returning to the discipline they demand. Side Effects brings Kenzie McEvely and Dave Homan together with Tim Rieger to map out which employers may fit and to lay out the upside and the…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If self-funding is on your radar, this episode gets into the parts that actually matter.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from McGohan Brabender Side Affects: Disrupting Health Care