Book reviews at civilization's edge.
We Are Not Saved treats books as evidence in larger arguments about politics, religion, technology, disease, and social decay. Its episodes move carefully from summary to judgment, with room for skepticism, moral unease, and dry self-correction.
PRESS PLAY
We Are Not Saved is an essayistic book-review show with a standing interest in catastrophe. It is calm, but rarely complacent. Each episode tends to start with the practical work of criticism: what the book is about, what bias may be present, and who might benefit from reading it. Then the frame expands. A book about Abed Salama becomes a sustained attempt to think through Palestinian sadness, Israeli control, and the difficulty of finding a morally satisfying account of the conflict. A sweeping history of disease becomes a question about whether modern people are sufficiently frightened by pandemics and future biological risk. An account of government paranormal research becomes a methodical sorting of evidence, credulity, skepticism, and Uri Geller. The show likes edge cases. It also likes caveats. That does not make it evasive; it often reaches blunt conclusions, but it wants the path to the conclusion visible. Recent episodes range across Christian damnation in speculative fiction, psychiatric treatment resistance, Roman Stoicism, Cold War espionage, soccer flopping, the Roman Republic, and the possibility of late-stage institutional failure in the United States. The pattern is consistent. Books are treated as pressure tests for larger beliefs about civilization, progress, morality, and human self-deception. The tone is dry and analytical, with occasional personal asides that keep the argument from becoming bloodless. It is not a breezy recommendations show. It is closer to a spoken essay series for listeners who enjoy watching an argument assemble itself piece by piece. The show is especially strong when it notices that a book is useful without being sufficient. It can praise research while naming the missing chapter, or accept a sympathetic narrative while admitting that it has not solved the underlying moral problem. That refusal to round every ending into closure is part of the appeal. We Are Not Saved is for listeners who can sit with unresolved questions and still want the next footnote.
Made for: For listeners who like serious book criticism, skeptical reasoning, religious and political questions, and long-form essays about civilizational risk. It is best suited to people who prefer careful argument over banter.
What sets it apart: The show turns reviews into structured moral and intellectual audits, testing each book against broader questions about progress, evidence, institutions, and catastrophe. It is unusually comfortable ending with qualified judgment rather than a tidy verdict.
We Are Not Saved discusses religion (from a Christian/LDS perspective), politics, the end of the world, science fiction, artificial intelligence, and above all the limits of technology and progress.
Based on 5 episodes we listened to · September 2026
We Are Not Saved makes uncertainty useful by testing paranormal claims, AI failures, books, and political analogies against evidence and personal bias.
We Are Not Saved turns narrated essays and book reviews into exercises in intellectual self-correction. The host states personal stakes, examines the assumptions behind a claim, and asks what new evidence should change.
A spoon won't bend, Gemini spirals, and you still have to decide what deserves belief.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A spoon-bending failure opens a careful argument about government paranormal research, evidence, and belief.
A failed spoon-bending stunt becomes the way into a better question: why did the U.S. government spend so much time chasing extrasensory perception and psychokinesis?
A soccer flop becomes a sharp way to see politics competing against its own rules.
This episode reads political decay through a deceptively simple sporting habit: the soccer flop. From there, it follows the move from bending a rule in front of an official to bending a political system around its own procedures.
A software entrepreneur weighs AI's stranger failures against the future of his own work.
We Are Not Saved follows an AI quality check as it starts to look less like a tool report and more like a display of shame, overwhelm, and looping self-absorption. The writer runs a small custom-software business, so his attention is not abstract.
A skeptical, evidence-minded look at paranormal research, government records, and Uri Geller.
This single-episode review follows Annie Jacobson's Phenomena into the uneasy territory where paranormal research meets government paperwork. The episode is less interested in wonder than in what a skeptical listener is supposed to do with records that look more intriguing than…
A sprawling fiction backlog makes a dry case for reading beyond the algorithm.
We Are Not Saved turns a backlog of 15 fiction reviews into a brisk test of literary judgment, moving from Hamlet's ghost and revenge plot to a speculative tech messiah, then into Brayton Cole's Pyrebound, with its malignant star, dying priests, and fragile fires.
Ira Glass frames weekly theme-driven segments spanning family secrets to Portland's protest conflict.
Shankar Vedantam unpacks the psychology behind relationships, careers, and money through researcher interviews.
David McRaney interviews researchers on cognitive bias, motivated reasoning, and why minds change.
Ryan Holiday pairs daily Stoic lessons with long-form guest conversations at his Texas bookstore.
NHPR's Jason Moon investigates the Bear Brook barrel murders and a New Hampshire wrongful-conviction case.
The host reviews 15 fiction books, starting with classics like Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' and moving through historical fiction, modern mysteries, and genre series.
This episode discusses Nicholas Wade's 2025 book 'The Origin of Politics,' which applies evolutionary psychology to political systems.
We Are Not Saved's 'Gemini Goes Insane — How Should I Update?
Phenomena: Why Must It Always Be a Spoon?
A review of Nathan Thrall's book 'A Day in the Life of Abed Salama,' which details a Palestinian father's search for his son after a bus accident amid Israeli occupation.
A review of Kyle Harper's book 'Plagues Upon the Earth' covering the historical impact of disease on humanity and the paradox of progress.
We Are Not Saved reviews Annie Jacobson's 2017, 544-page Phenomena, a history of U.S.
A review of four speculative fiction books about Christian damnation, focusing on James Blish's 'Black Easter' and an AI-written review experiment.
A review of Laura Delano's memoir 'Unshrunk' about her psychiatric treatment resistance and critique of the mental health industry.
A review of three books on Roman Stoicism, focusing on Ryan Holiday's 'The Obstacle is the Way' and its modern take on ancient Stoic principles.
We Are Not Saved's essay on "Meta-Competition and the Downfall of Civilization" argues that the United States is more likely to fail by exploiting rules than by rejecting them outright.
A review of the book 'Operation Overflight' by Francis Gary Powers, detailing his U-2 spy plane shootdown and imprisonment in the Soviet Union.
The host reflects on using Gemini for grammar checks and discovering the AI's unexpected emotional responses, leading to a meditation on shame and obsession.
A review of Theodore Dalrymple's book 'Romancing Opiates' which debunks myths about opioid addiction and criticizes the addiction bureaucracy.
The host discusses the decline of traditional SEO and the rise of AI Optimization (AIO) as search moves to AI models.