U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

This episode features oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Trump v.

A Supreme Court oral argument about whether withdrawal liability calculations for pension funds must use actuarial assumptions fixed at the valuation date or can be changed later.

This oral argument examines whether New Jersey Transit should be classified as a state agency or private entity, focusing on its governmental powers and implications for state sovereignty.

This episode presents oral arguments in the case Little v.

This episode presents West Virginia's legal argument defending its law that assigns students to sports teams based on biological sex, arguing it aligns with Title IX and constitutional principles while protecting fairness and safety in girls' sports.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether Hawaii's law banning firearms on private property open to the public without affirmative permission violates the Second Amendment right to publicly carry firearms.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether Internet service providers like Cox Communications can be held liable for copyright infringement by users, challenging a Fourth Circuit ruling that required ISPs to terminate accused infringers.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether courts can consider sentencing errors or unfairness as extraordinary and compelling reasons for sentence reductions under Section 3582, challenging the government's restrictive interpretation.

This Supreme Court argument involves First Choice Women's Resource Centers challenging a New Jersey Attorney General subpoena for donor information as a violation of First Amendment associational rights.

This episode analyzes a legal argument about whether courts should apply de novo review to determine if undisputed facts constitute persecution under immigration law, contrasting it with the government's position.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case GEO Group v.

This episode presents a Supreme Court oral argument in Rico v.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Louisiana v.

This Supreme Court argument involves Learning Resources v.

This episode presents a legal argument before the Supreme Court in the case Ellingburg v.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether statutory gatekeeping requirements for habeas corpus applications apply to federal prisoners' motions to vacate under Section 2255.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Laboratory Corporation of America v.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited v.

This Supreme Court oral argument challenges coordinated party spending limits as unconstitutional under the First Amendment, arguing they're unnecessary to prevent bribery given existing safeguards.

This episode presents a Supreme Court oral argument in Hamm v.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether Section 47B of the Investment Company Act implies a private right of action for contract enforcement.

This episode presents a legal argument before the Supreme Court advocating for the overturning of Humphrey's Executor to reinforce presidential oversight of executive power and prevent an unaccountable federal bureaucracy.

This episode presents a Supreme Court oral argument in Olivier v.

This episode analyzes the legal arguments in Urias-Orellana v.

This Supreme Court argument addresses President Trump's use of IEPA tariffs to combat trade deficits and the fentanyl crisis, focusing on presidential authority and legal challenges.

This episode presents oral arguments in the case Bost v.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Barrett v.

This episode presents oral arguments in a Supreme Court case challenging Oklahoma's exclusion of religious groups from its charter school program, focusing on whether this violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument where the petitioner argues that the Eighth Circuit's ruling should be overturned because the respondent school district has conceded the key legal issue and is now advancing a procedurally barred new theory that would undermine disability protections.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument transcript where an attorney argues that the combat-related special compensation statute grants the Secretary authority to settle claims, making the barring act inapplicable.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument where the petitioner argues that the EPA's waiver allowing California to limit gas-powered vehicles harms their business and should be vacated based on legal precedents and evidence.

This episode discusses a Supreme Court case about whether the tax court retains jurisdiction under Section 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code when the IRS's proposed levy is no longer viable.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows claims against the United States for intentional torts committed by federal law enforcement officers, focusing on sovereign immunity and statutory interpretation.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Rutherford v.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether district courts can consider changes in sentencing law when deciding compassionate release petitions under the First Step Act.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument where the petitioner's attorney argues that the Louisiana Department of Corrections violated Ralupa by forcibly shaving a prisoner's hair despite a controlling precedent protecting that right, seeking damages under individual capacity provisions.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Hain Celestial Group v.

This episode presents oral arguments from the Supreme Court case Trump v.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument where the petitioner argues that Hawaii's law banning firearms on private property open to the public without affirmative permission violates the Second Amendment by lacking historical tradition support.

This episode features oral arguments in Parrish v.

This Supreme Court oral argument involves Mahmoud v.

This episode features oral arguments in Kennedy v.

This episode features oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Pitchford v.

A lawyer argues that venue for a document falsification offense is improper in San Francisco because the essential conduct occurred in Seattle.

An attorney argues before the U.S.

An attorney argues before the U.S.

Oral argument in Flowers Foods v.

Oral argument in Catholic Charities Bureau v.

Oral argument in FDA v.

This episode features the oral argument in Watzig v.

An attorney argues before the U.S.