Arguments under pressure.
TRIGGERnometry turns hot subjects into pointed, conversational argument. Recent episodes move from Christian nationalism and AI risk to Iran, MAGA media fights, energy policy, comedy, and the cost of bad assumptions.
PRESS PLAY
TRIGGERnometry is a debate-driven political commentary show with a taste for difficult subjects and visible friction. It does not approach controversy as a museum object. It puts claims on the table, asks what they would mean in practice, and lets the conversation get tense enough to reveal the tradeoffs. Recent episodes show the range clearly. Andrew Wilson is pressed on Christian nationalism, secularism, public symbols, family policy, and whether one worldview should guide civic life. Dr Roman Yampolskiy brings the discussion into AI risk, human purpose, automation, relationships, and the strange edge cases that follow from artificial companionship. Mark Normand’s episode is looser and more comic, moving through sport, public reaction, and jokes that test the room. The Batya Ungar-Sargon debate turns toward MAGA, podcasters, voters, Tucker Carlson, Israel, Iran, and the gap between online political media and ordinary Republican opinion. Elica Le Bon’s return is much more grave, centered on Iran, uprising, war, defections, and the possibility that calls for resistance could end with people dying for nothing. Mike Baker’s episode examines the Iran conflict through intelligence, terrorism, American interests, Israeli interests, and the risk of a plan that was not fully thought through. A separate Iran War episode folds those conversations into broader worries about energy prices, recession, net zero politics, and Britain’s exposure to global shocks. The show’s best moments come when certainty meets a follow-up question. It can be combative. It can also be funny, especially when banter interrupts a heavy line of thought without fully derailing it. The tone is skeptical, impatient with euphemism, and drawn to the difference between stated intentions and real-world outcomes. Listeners will hear strong views, but also frequent caveats and reversals as ideas are tested under pressure. The result is not polished consensus journalism. It is argumentative sense-making for people who want political and cultural disputes left a little messy, because the mess is often where the truth of the disagreement sits.
Made for: For listeners who like political and cultural debate with sharp questions, strong positions, and enough uncertainty to keep the conversation alive. It suits people interested in free speech, geopolitics, religion, AI, media, and the social consequences of policy.
What sets it apart: TRIGGERnometry stands out by letting disagreement remain audible instead of converting every topic into a finished take. The show’s conversations often move from moral principle to policy consequence, with jokes, interruptions, and direct pushback left in the room.
Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster create honest conversations with fascinating people. New episodes every Sunday and Wednesday. Become a Premium Member to receive exclusive benefits https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/
Based on 6 episodes we listened to · September 2026
Direct follow-up questions and irreverent exchanges reveal the assumptions beneath arguments about power, war, religion and emerging technology.
TRIGGERnometry moves between guest interviews and host-led discussion, with Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster testing political claims through direct questions, quick challenges and irreverent exchanges.
Iran's energy shock and sex robots share a home here; bring your appetite for an argument.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A hard-edged debate about Christian authority, secularism, and the real-world edge cases that expose its assumptions.
The episode makes a blunt case that Christians should shape nearly everything, and the hosts keep pushing that idea into harder terrain. They test what it would mean for homosexuality, homosexual marriage, secularism, public symbols, family policy, and population politics, which…
A sharp, unsettling conversation about AI, vanishing work, and the search for meaning.
AI's danger becomes a question of what people do with themselves if machines take over nearly every kind of work. The conversation with Roman Yampolskiy starts with a deliberately provocative idea about sex robots and the market for human partners, then shifts into a larger…
A brisk, combative hang that turns jokes about power and sports into a running argument.
It opens on Epstein talk, then moves quickly through arrests and police questioning before widening into sports-and-politics banter that keeps circling the question of what people are actually reacting to.
A sharp look at Iran, blowback, and whether U.S. support can hold.
Talk turns to Iran, U.S.-Israel alignment, and the question of whether Trump's base would stay with him if the conflict stretches on. It also brings in the risk of broader retaliation, including global terror and lone wolf attacks. Baker argues that the U.S.
A war-and-energy argument that connects conflict, household costs, and recession risk.
TRIGGERnometry presents the war in Iran as a wider argument about energy prices, politics, and recession risk. The hosts stress that they are not experts, yet lean on people they say have access to the administration's thinking, and the discussion keeps returning to the Strait…
A forceful live account of Iran's uprising, focused on street momentum, regime pressure, and what could follow.
Trigonometry's live Iran update frames the uprising as a test of scale, stamina, and what might come after the Islamic Republic. Maya Tusi traces the protests from economic strain and broader public frustration to a movement he says had been building for years, with Iranian…
A sharp look at the gap between political podcasters and mainstream Republican voters.
The episode tracks a widening split between political podcasters and the Republican voters at the center of the discussion. Its argument moves through the war, Israel, Iran, Epstein, and foreign policy, using the claim that 80 to 90 percent of Republicans back the president's…
A near-daily politics rundown from Dana Goldberg and Alison Gill on Trump-era legal fights.
Three Slate journalists debate the week's politics, plus live shows and author interviews.
Mike Pesca opens with a monologue, then digs into Supreme Court ethics and Iran policy.
TRIGGERnometry hosts a live stream with Mahyar Tousi to discuss the ongoing 12-day uprising in Iran against the Islamic Republic.
Batya Ungar-Sargon debates Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster on whether podcasters reflect MAGA voter realities.
A presidential advisor discusses Davos and Greenland in a live special report.
One speaker makes a strong case for Christians leading society.
AI safety researcher Roman Yampolskiy tells TRIGGERnometry that superintelligent AI poses an existential risk to humanity because it would pursue goals unrelated to human welfare without built-in concern for human survival.
The episode opens with a sponsor read for Ethos, then quickly moves into Epstein, police questioning, and a teasing back-and-forth that keeps pressing on how far a joke can go before the room decides it wants a straight answer.
Batya Ungar-Sargon debates whether podcasters are destroying MAGA by being out of touch with average Republican voters on issues like Israel and foreign policy.
Elika Le Bon discusses the necessity of regime change in Iran through uprisings and defections, warning against a war that leaves the regime in power.
Mike Baker joins the hosts for a blunt conversation about the Iran conflict.
The hosts say the Iran war matters because the Strait of Hormuz carries 20% of the world's oil, 25% of LNG, and half of traded fertilizer.
A live update on the Iran situation featuring expert analysis from Aimen Dean and Richard Miniter.
A live stream interview with Mahyar Tousi discussing events in Iran that mainstream media is ignoring.