Supreme Court Oral Arguments

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Olivier v.

This Supreme Court oral argument involves Chevron USA Inc.

This Supreme Court oral argument examines whether Congress's 1845 Election Day statute prevents states from allowing ballots cast by Election Day to be received afterward, with implications for modern voting practices.

This Supreme Court argument involves Learning Resources, Inc.

This episode presents a Supreme Court oral argument in Hunter v.

This episode presents oral arguments from the Supreme Court case Trump v.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether statutory gatekeeping requirements for habeas corpus applications apply to federal prisoners' motions to vacate under different legal sections.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether Royal Caribbean Cruises trafficked in confiscated property in Cuba under Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, focusing on statutory interpretation and remedies.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument challenging Montana's use of the emergency aid exception to justify warrantless police entry into a home where a shooting occurred.

This Supreme Court oral argument in Fernandez v.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether a final judgment should stand when a defendant was dismissed as fraudulently joined, even if that dismissal was later reversed on appeal.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument where the petitioner argues that Hawaii's law banning firearms on private property open to the public without affirmative permission violates the Second Amendment by lacking historical precedent.

This Supreme Court oral argument examines whether New Jersey Transit should be classified as a state agency or private entity for legal immunity purposes, focusing on its governmental powers and state control.

This episode presents a legal argument defending Idaho's law that classifies athletes based on sex to preserve women's sports, arguing it does not discriminate based on gender identity.

This episode presents West Virginia's legal argument defending its policy of assigning students to sports teams based on biological sex, arguing that Title IX permits this approach and that it ensures fairness and safety for girls in school athletics.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited v.

This Supreme Court oral argument transcript involves a case where Flowers Foods argues that delivery worker Brock is not exempt under Section 1 as a transportation worker because he only performs intrastate deliveries after goods have crossed their final border.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether coordinated party spending limits violate the First Amendment, with the petitioner arguing they are unnecessary and ineffective at preventing bribery.

This episode analyzes a legal case where Delaware's requirement for an expert affidavit in medical malpractice complaints conflicts with federal rules of civil procedure in federal court.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Trump v.

This episode presents oral arguments in a Supreme Court case challenging Oklahoma's exclusion of religious groups from its charter school program, focusing on whether this violates the Free Exercise Clause.

This episode presents a legal argument before the Supreme Court regarding whether the Helms-Burton Act abrogates sovereign immunity for Cuban instrumentalities in claims brought under Title III.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether district courts can consider changes in sentencing law when deciding compassionate release petitions for inmates serving long sentences.

A Supreme Court oral argument where counsel argues that Louisiana prison officials violated federal law by forcibly shaving a prisoner who asserted religious rights under Ralupa, seeking damages for the clear statutory violation.

This Supreme Court argument addresses Louisiana's race-based districting to remedy voting rights violations under Section 2, defending its constitutionality against challenges.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Villarreal v.

This episode analyzes the legal arguments in Trump v.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether withdrawal liability calculations for pension funds must use actuarial assumptions fixed at the valuation date or can be adjusted later.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether federal law preempts state tort claims by a soldier injured due to contractor negligence at Bagram.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether the Eighth Amendment bars a death sentence for a defendant with borderline IQ scores, focusing on how courts should interpret multiple IQ tests in intellectual disability claims.

This episode examines the legal doctrine of judicial estoppel in bankruptcy cases, specifically addressing whether a debtor's failure to update forms to disclose a cause of action should be presumed intentional or require a holistic analysis of intent.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Rico v.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether Section 47B of the Investment Company Act implies a private right of action for contract enforcement.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act classifies restitution as criminal punishment subject to the ex post facto clause in Ellingburg v.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether state negligent hiring claims against transportation brokers are preempted by federal law regarding motor vehicle safety regulation.

This episode presents oral arguments about whether federal courts should apply de novo review when determining if undisputed facts constitute persecution under immigration law.

This Supreme Court argument addresses whether the postal exception in the Federal Tort Claims Act preserves U.S.

This episode presents a legal argument before the Supreme Court in Pung v.

This is a legal argument before the Supreme Court about whether federal courts can use equitable authority to excuse the 30-day deadline for removing a case involving a pipeline dispute initiated by state officials.

This Supreme Court oral argument challenges a Colorado law that bans counselors from discussing certain gender and sexuality topics with minors, arguing it violates First Amendment protections for professional speech.

This episode features oral arguments in Laboratory Corporation of America v.

The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in AJT v.

This episode features oral arguments in Martin v.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case GEO Group v.

This Supreme Court argument involves First Choice Women's Resource Centers challenging New Jersey's Attorney General's subpoena for donor information as a violation of First Amendment associational rights.

This is a Supreme Court oral argument about whether Illinois's practice of counting mail-in ballots received up to two weeks after Election Day gives congressional candidate Bost standing to sue by causing financial harm and potentially affecting election outcomes.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether the Second Amendment prohibits temporarily disarming habitual marijuana users based on historical analogies to laws disarming habitual drunkards for public safety reasons.

This Supreme Court oral argument addresses whether Internet service providers like Cox Communications can be held liable for copyright infringement by users, challenging a Fourth Circuit ruling that could force ISPs to police online activity.

This episode presents oral arguments in the Supreme Court case Barrett v.

In Pitchford v.

Supreme Court Oral Arguments in Abouammo v.

Jules v.

["Supreme Court Oral Arguments' Soto v.

Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v.

This episode features the oral argument in Catholic Charities Bureau v.

This episode features oral arguments in a Supreme Court case about whether RICO excludes personal injury claims.

An attorney argues before the U.S.

This episode features the oral argument in Garland v.

Oral argument in Williams v.

SFFA attorney Mr.

In Supreme Court Oral Arguments, Carson v.

In Supreme Court Oral Arguments, Case 20-843 concerns New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v.