Plenty of true crime stays with a single disappearance. State Of Missing groups disappearances by state instead. Each installment picks a U.S. state, collects a set of its missing persons cases and works through them one after another. Recent installments cover Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Mexico and California, and the larger states run across multiple parts. California is big enough that the host plans three. That host is Laura, and she tells the cases herself. The episodes open with a burst of teaser lines before the welcome, each squeezing a case into a single hook: a scared young boy who leaves only a note, a woman who boards a train, an attorney who vanishes along with his son. After the teasers, each case is built from specifics. In one, a child's likely route to a new home becomes the search area, covered on foot, on horseback and by helicopter while bloodhounds follow a trail for about two miles. In another, a missing man's description runs down to his dreadlocks, his surgical scars, a possible alias and the engraving on his wedding band. Suspects get the same close reading, with the questions they asked police and the accusations they made against others laid out in order. Laura does not hide her own view of the people involved. When a man's account of where a missing child went keeps changing, she says plainly that she thinks he is lying. The range in time is wide. One California installment gathers child disappearances from 1956 to 1968 around what she calls a single connecting puzzle piece, while a Louisiana case is recent enough that she remembers it and knows some listeners have been waiting for it. When a case is still open, she may close it with a plea for anyone with information to contact the sheriff's office working it. Between cases, the tone loosens. She apologizes when illness and a cracking voice delay a release, thanks listeners for their support since she restarted the podcast, and considers drawing the next state out of a hat. One sign-off simply announces that she is going to bed. That mix of case-file detail and offhand candor is what sets the show apart. It suits a listener who wants a broad sweep of disappearances that, as she puts it, have sometimes seemed forgotten, sorted by place and told by a narrator who lets her own reactions show.