No Hay Derecho

No Hay Derecho is a Peruvian political interview show with little patience for soft framing. Its center of gravity is power: who has it, how it is organized, which institutions are being bent, and what that means for an election year. The conversations are fast. They are also dense, moving through Congress, campaigns, legal bodies, regional politics, party alliances, and accusations of institutional capture without pausing to make the listener comfortable. Glatzer Tuesta’s role is not neutral moderation in the gentle sense. He frames long questions, places evidence inside them, and asks guests to respond to the institutional charge at hand. In recent episodes, Elections 2026 dominate the agenda. Alberto Quintanilla discusses the Alianza Venceremos, left unity, Puno, and the challenge of building a viable alternative from multiple groups. Delia Espinoza’s campaign for dean of the College of Lawyers of Lima becomes a debate over legal conscience, ethics, transparency, and resistance to power. José Ragas brings a historical lens to candidates, vote transfer, Fujimori politics, Castillo echoes, and Peru’s place in a wider regional moment. The Sigrid Bazán episode turns sharply toward Congress, legitimacy, violence, racism, classism, and the claim that a majority bloc forecloses decent politics. The show’s recurring structure is challenge, answer, follow-up, escalation. It names names. It asks whether institutions still function. It gives guests room for extended arguments, but the interviewer keeps the pressure on the unresolved point. The result is not a calm civic explainer. It is a serious, combative record of Peruvian politics as a contested legal and democratic battlefield.