A focused case for treating play as part of a good life.
The episode treats videogames as more than a clever hook. Spencer Case and his guests keep coming back to Bioshock and Mortal Kombat, and those examples do the real work.

Spencer Case
77 episodes listed below
PRESS PLAY
Philosophical excursions into interesting, and often controversial, topics. Hosted by Spencer Case.
Based on 6 episodes we listened to · September 2026
Spencer Case turns contested philosophical questions into patient conversations that clarify premises, objections, and real-world stakes.
Spencer Case treats philosophy as an argument to be tested in conversation. Episodes move through competing cases for God's existence, the legitimacy of policing, affirmative action, death and nuclear deterrence.
Spencer Case asks what death means, then makes your first answer defend itself.
Press play if you want
Short reviews from the PlayNext desk, based on the episodes we processed.
A focused case for treating play as part of a good life.
The episode treats videogames as more than a clever hook. Spencer Case and his guests keep coming back to Bioshock and Mortal Kombat, and those examples do the real work.
A careful law-and-rights argument that keeps asking what judges are really doing.
It frames a law-and-rights debate as a question of what law is allowed to mean. Spencer Case and Stephen Kirshner move from Holmes and legal positivism into substantive due process, judicial restraint, and the unsettled idea that judges are either reading rights or creating…
A skeptical look at AI risk, model limits, and the problem of control.
Micro-Digressions treats AI risk as a real debate, not a slogan. Spencer Case and David Cross start with familiar chatbot behavior, then keep pressing on the harder question of what people are actually controlling when a system can appear useful without being understood.
A conversational, skeptical look at immortality that keeps its feet on the ground.
This episode treats death and immortality as a practical question, not a thought experiment kept safely at arm's length. Spencer Case and Travis Timmerman work through Williams's dilemma about categorical desires, and they keep the exchange clear without sanding off the hard…
A grounded philosophy conversation about testimony, expertise, and the limits of skepticism.
MicroDegressions stays close to the ground even as it wanders into epistemology. Spencer Case and Gordon Barnes work through testimony, expertise, cognitive bias, and the stories people use to sort out belief, with Barnes noting that he wanted the book to do philosophy through…
A grounded discussion of socialism, education, and the burden ideas carry when politics turns them into practice.
Ben Burgess and Spencer Case treat socialism less like a label and more like a live political question. The conversation is strongest when it gets into teacher incentives, public education, civics outcomes, and Finland, then broadens to the harder issue of how much blame a…
A sober dualist case for why consciousness still resists easy physical explanation.
Spencer Case frames consciousness as a live argument rather than a settled lesson. Mike Humer moves through mind-body dualism, the Mary case, Nagel's bat, and the hard point that brain facts still leave experience untouched.
A careful new-year conversation that makes death feel less like a slogan and more like a problem.
Micro-Digressions uses the turn of the year to sit with a plain but slippery question: what does death actually name? Spencer Case and Travis Timmerman keep the conversation close to everyday examples as they work through the overlap between biological life, sentience, and the…




Peter Boghossian applies street epistemology to guests debating free speech, immigration, and belief.

Vox's narrative reporting on factory farming, pandemic risk, and its Good Robot AI safety series.
Spencer Case talks with Eric Weiland about his book Guided by Voices, which is about advice and moral testimony, not a schizophrenia memoir.
The host and guest discuss the book 'Why It's Okay to Be a Moderate', addressing criticisms from both political sides and the underrepresentation of moderates in public discourse.
Spencer Case returns after a long gap and starts by apologizing for the break.
Spencer Case talks with Dave Baker at the University of Michigan.
Spencer Case opens by framing Israel-Palestine as a topic everyone already knows is divisive.
Micro-Digressions: A Philosophy Podcast, “Rant-a-thon 2024!
Spencer Case brings on Mark Oppenheimer, who says he has argued South African hate-speech cases and opens with the country’s post-apartheid speech framework.
Spencer Case and Dave Baker return to nuclear weapons with a focus on the hydrogen bomb, intercontinental missiles, and the politics of missile defense.
Spencer Case interviews philosopher Mike Huemer about Progressive Myths, a self-published book covering individual cases, police shootings, feminism, economics and the roots of wokeism.
Spencer Case opens by asking Mike Humer what consciousness is, and Humer answers plainly: he is a mind-body dualist, so consciousness is real and not a physical state, property, or event.
Spencer Case opens Micro-Degressions: A Philosophy Podcast’s 2024 rant-a-thon, Part 1, with Matthew Adelstein arguing that the Shrimp Welfare Project can prevent about 1,500 shrimp deaths per dollar by paying for electrical stunners.
Spencer Case and Travis Timmerman return to their conversation about death and dying.
MicroDegressions returns to Matthew Adelstein’s list of arguments for the existence of God.
Spencer Case opens the show with Matt Lutz and sets up a political conversation around the Biden administration.
The conversation opens with a guest naming his philosophical nightmare.
Spencer Case sits down with Ben Burgess to talk through socialism and the problem of judging political ideas by how they fare in practice and by how later readers use them.
Spencer Case opens by asking Jake Monaghan to define policing.
Spencer Case and Matthew Adelstein spend the episode ranking arguments for the existence of God from F tier up, using examples like the Neoplatonic proof, the nomological argument, the moral argument, and the modal ontological argument.
Spencer Case opens episode 51 of Micro-Digressions: A Philosophy Podcast by saying it is the first 2024 episode, now recorded on video for YouTube as well as audio platforms.
Spencer Case and Oliver Traldi center the conversation on Traldi’s article “Diffusing Academic Freedom,” which grew out of a Princeton postdoc, a FIRE conference in Boston, and an earlier coauthored version with Greg Conte.
Spencer Case welcomes David Cross back to MicroDegressions.
Spencer Case and Nathan Kofnes spend the episode trying to define “wokeism,” starting from the claim that the “wokeness is peaked” narrative is wrong.
Spencer Case opens Micro-Digressions: A Philosophy Podcast with Michael Huemer and Steve Kirshner on free will, says the topic was one of the most requested by listeners, and notes that the episode has visuals on YouTube.
Spencer Case opens with some new-year housekeeping, a YouTube plug, a few fan-mail notes, and the warning that his second child is due soon, so he may have to miss an episode or two.
Spencer Case and Michael Huemer return to Progressive Myths and start with feminism, the gender pay gap, and claims about sexual-assault accusations.
Spencer Case talks with Ryan W.
Spencer Case interviews Oliver Traldi about his book on political beliefs, exploring how events like the 2016 election inspired his study of political epistemology.
Spencer Case and guest Stephen Kirshner explore philosophy of law, critiquing legal realism and positivism, and apply these ideas to the Students for Fair Admissions case against Harvard and UNC.
Host Spencer Case interviews colleague Kevin Vallier on trust in liberal societies, exploring how trust functions as a moral foundation amid diversity.