Kermode on Film is a film show that behaves like both a live archive and an ongoing argument. Its centre is Mark Kermode’s critical voice, carried across MK3D recordings from BFI venues and more informal conversations with Jack Howard. The format gives the podcast range. Some episodes feel like a front-row seat at a film event, with named guests talking through bodies of work, new projects, inspirations, and craft. Others are intimate, restless exchanges from the Sun Pub in London’s West End, where a single title can become a long dispute about taste, memory, and what criticism is allowed to change its mind about. Eyes Wide Shut is treated through old reviews, new viewings, Kubrick’s final film, marriage, desire, and pop-cultural afterlife. Project Hail Mary opens onto Ryan Gosling’s comic timing, science-fiction companionship, Silent Running, and the odd emotional precision of genre filmmaking. Pirates of the Caribbean becomes a split-screen debate about blockbuster confidence, Johnny Depp’s performance, darkness in franchise filmmaking, and what large-scale movies once felt like. Awards episodes use the BAFTAs and Oscars less as scoreboards than as excuses to ask whether trophies matter after the morning headlines fade. The television conversation around Pluribus shows the feed is not sealed off from series culture, especially when Vince Gilligan, Breaking Bad, and Better Call Saul enter the frame. The live-show strand gives the podcast a different weight. Andrew Cotting discusses films, VR work, exhibition space, memory, autobiography, and resistant definitions. Dame Twiggy Lawson appears through a documentary lens, with career, image, film work, and pop performance in view. Edgar Wright brings talk of The Running Man, physical media, choreography, action movement, Jackie Chan’s influence, and the geography of Soho film culture. Ben Wheatley and Jack O’Connell add strange cinema, performance, and formative screen influences. Across it all, the show is energetic but not frictionless. It likes digression. It likes disagreement. It trusts that film history, audience questions, pub banter, and exacting criticism can sit in the same room.