Infosec Decoded covers cybersecurity as a live argument, not a finished briefing. Its core material is security news: prompt injection against phone-based AI, formally verified code, AI-assisted vulnerability discovery, supply chain compromise, abandoned cloud infrastructure, router restrictions, and tools that scan code changes for malicious updates. The recurring question is blunt: what breaks when software, institutions, and incentives meet the real world? The show often starts with a narrow item and then keeps widening. A report on Neural Exec becomes a conversation about how prompt injection is evolving beyond tricking a model with a clever story. A discussion of Claude-related security research turns into a bigger problem of disclosure, attacker speed, and whether defenders have any choice but to use AI scanners too. Supply chain attacks are treated with particular seriousness because they arrive through legitimate channels, signed updates, and trusted systems. That is the uncomfortable part. Infosec Decoded is also less tidy than a standard tech-news digest. It leaves in the caveats. It admits confusion. It follows side roads into public policy, cloud economics, fake QR-code tickets, accident analysis, AI content rules, and organizational change. The show’s AI coverage is neither cheerleading nor reflexive dismissal. It is interested in where AI actually changes workflows: companies becoming AI-native, attackers using normal-language commands, defenders sending diffs to models, and agents handling repetitive operational work. The skepticism is practical. Bad policy, subscription incentives, misconfigured systems, and vague product labels all get treated as security-relevant facts. The pacing is quick, but the reasoning is conversational and sometimes rough-edged. That roughness is part of the value. It feels like a technical debrief from people still sorting the story while the story is moving. Listeners looking for glossy explainers may find it too rangy. Listeners who enjoy security news with dry judgment, historical analogies, and a willingness to say when something makes no sense will find a useful companion.