How Do We Fix It? is a civic interview show organized around repair rather than outrage. Its recent run is closely focused on Braver Angels and the everyday work of depolarization. Richard Davies opens with the stakes, then lets volunteers and participants describe the work in their own terms. The pace is measured. The subjects are not small. Episodes return to toxic polarization, immigration, ICE-related fear, social distrust, media exhaustion, and the difficulty of getting people to sit across from those they strongly oppose. But the show rarely stays at the level of diagnosis. It is most interested in what people try next. One episode follows Braver Angels ambassadors as they reach beyond the already persuaded and talk with people who may be skeptical or simply unaware that another civic path exists. Another looks at the Citizens Commission on Immigration, where David Lapp describes an effort to include the experiences of everyday voters in a debate often dominated by loud public voices. A Minnesota conversation with Melinda Voss and Scott Schluter is described as uneasy, tense, and worth hearing. It asks what happens after a surge of fear and anger. The answer offered is not neat. It is face-to-face conversation, lower heat, and a willingness to keep asking what action would actually help. Other episodes widen the frame. Natalie LaRoche and Genevieve Rauschenbusch talk about younger people, civic space, and the kinds of quick, direct communication that younger people may bring to the movement. Sam Recheck discusses Braver Angels debates as structured disagreement that can be topical, energetic, and even fun. Chauncey Williams brings the premise down to a park bench, where conversations with strangers reveal assumptions, friction, and unexpected personal stories. The show’s strength is its refusal to make disagreement theatrical. It treats conflict as something to be examined closely, with enough patience for contradiction and enough hope to keep looking for usable fixes.