Guerra e Paz

Guerra e Paz is a current-affairs program with a clear geopolitical center of gravity. It does not treat war, elections, energy, and diplomacy as separate stories. The recent run ties them together through a careful reading of incentives, institutions, and military facts. Germano Almeida appears as the recurring specialist in geopolitics, answering prompts that often begin with a concrete development: a call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, a possible Iranian proposal, a Pentagon plan for Dark Eagle hypersonic missiles, or a change in U.S. electoral maps. The answers are long and explanatory. They move from the immediate news item into the conditions that make it matter. Iran is discussed through nuclear negotiations, port access, ballistic missiles, regime durability, U.S. pressure, Israeli action, and the political value of declaring victory. Ukraine returns through ceasefire proposals, Russian symbolism around May 9, and the continuing shadow of nuclear risk. Europe receives unusually granular treatment. European enlargement is framed through treaty reform, qualified majority voting, sanctions, gradual integration, and the danger that a new member state could later obstruct common policy. The program also follows how foreign policy feeds back into domestic politics. Farmers, tariffs, gasoline prices, congressional districts, polls, and Republican discipline all become part of the same field of analysis. Its style is measured rather than conversationally loose. Short exchanges open the door to layered arguments, with figures, dates, named leaders, and procedural details used to keep the discussion grounded. The show can be grave when the material demands it, especially around civilian violence, nuclear threats, and military escalation. It can also be dryly critical of political performance and strategic incoherence. Guerra e Paz is for listeners who want the machinery behind the headline: who benefits, who is constrained, what rules apply, and what consequences may follow.