Calling DIBS is a measured, interview-driven show about behavioral insights as they are practiced in public policy, social programs, research, and organizational life. It is less interested in quick tips than in the mechanics of changing behavior responsibly. Kirsten Appelt usually starts with a guest's path into BI, then moves toward concrete projects, methodological choices, and the barriers that made the work difficult. The conversations have room to breathe. Guests describe problem scoping, partner conversations, literature reviews, target populations, implementation constraints, and the question of what can actually be measured. Recent episodes show that range clearly. Faraz Haki discusses employment outcomes, job training programs, registration materials, onboarding steps, and visual progress tools. Katherine Flashin talks through early childhood development and education work, including caregiver behavior and school re-enrollment after pandemic closures in Uganda. Nick Chesterly brings the frame of government measurement, future-facing policy, GDP, budgets, call centers, social media engagement, experimentation, and iteration. David Hardesty focuses on A/B tests, experiments, random sampling, random assignment, and the danger of treating every comparison as causal evidence. Greg Lockwood connects BI to hybrid work, deep work, office design, team autonomy, defaults, reminders, and organizational norms. Joanna Katter brings the work into immigration service strategy, where behavioral science methods are used to improve client service. Amara Martinez adds lessons from policy development and implementation across education, health, cultural affairs, and sport. Across these episodes, the show keeps returning to a few questions: What behavior matters? Can it move? Can it be measured? What would make the desired action easier for real people in a real system? The tone is warm and methodical. It works especially well for listeners who want behavioral science connected to institutions, not just individual decision quirks. Calling DIBS stands out because it treats evidence, context, and implementation as inseparable parts of the same conversation.