A Better Peace is the podcast of War Room, the online journal of the U.S. Army War College, and it asks its questions the way a teaching institution would. Episodes open with a set routine: a welcome, thanks to the Army War College Foundation for its support, and a reminder that the views belong to the speakers, not to the college or the Army. They close just as consistently, with an invitation to send feedback through the journal's website. In between, faculty take turns as interviewer. Tom Spahr, who introduces himself as the college's Chair of Strategic and Theater Intelligence, is a frequent interviewer, and intelligence is his steady subject. In one conversation he asks a guest which new technology is the biggest worry. The answer is not AI but the cell phone, because everyone carries one. The same exchange covers Edward Snowden and the NSA, along with surveillance and enhanced interrogation after 9-11, described as created for good reasons and perhaps taken too far. It also raises the problem of former intelligence officials making statements seen as political. Another guest turns to Russia. He argues that World War II, distant history for Americans, runs through Russian news every night and supports the Kremlin's story that it was forced into the war in Ukraine. He repeats 'we tried to warn them' several times in a row. A third guest explains how profit pushes commercial suppliers toward the cheapest supply chains, then talks about future intelligence platforms for the anti-access area denial problem while staying clear of anything classified. Technology comes up again in a conversation about autonomous systems. There, a scenario set at a forward command post in Poznan imagines systems built to protect beginning to direct and constrain human judgment as tensions escalate and speed becomes the priority. Daryl Driver, director of the Advanced Strategic Art Program, talks with a researcher about how the Islamic State timed leadership speeches, including ones by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, to coincide with particular operations. Driver then asks where joint doctrine's assumptions about operational risk might break down once non-state special operations are taken into account, and he frames the question around their shared work in professional military education. Ron Granary, a professor of history, leads a conversation tied to the college's 2025 Homeland Defense Symposium. His guest, Burt Tussing, directs the Homeland Defense and Security Issues Group at the college's Center for Strategic Leadership. They separate homeland defense from the more familiar homeland security and treat the two as meant to work together. That conversation defines its terms at the start, so it is an easy first stop for a newcomer. The back catalog is large, so picking by subject makes more sense than starting at the beginning. Throughout, War College educators put specific, practical questions to researchers and practitioners and connect the answers to doctrine, intelligence practice and the defense of the United States.