Was wichtig ist · Die Presse

Super Bowl, Grammys und Co.: Wie viel Kulturkampf steckt im Entertainment?

·14 min·1 clip
Donald Trump called Bad Bunny's Super Bowl halftime show one of the worst, sparking debate about politics in entertainment.
The episode begins by highlighting Donald Trump's criticism of Bad Bunny's Super Bowl halftime show, setting up the central theme of politics in entertainment. It notes that this intersection is not new, citing historical examples like Jane Fonda and Marlon Brando opposing the Vietnam War. However, the hosts argue that today's landscape is more polarized due to digitalization and social media, which remove gatekeepers and allow instant, widespread expression. Algorithms further amplify extremes, making conflicts more visible. The discussion moves to specific celebrities, starting with those opposing Trump, such as Bad Bunny, Billie Eilish, and country singer Zach Bryan. It then contrasts with supporters like Nicki Minaj, who shifted from criticizing Trump to embracing him, and mentions Kanye West and Amber Rose as other examples of political reversals. The hosts explore motivations behind these stances, including theories that Nicki Minaj might seek Trump's help to free her imprisoned brother or fear personal repercussions. They question the sincerity and credibility of such engagements, noting external factors like money or personal advantage. The conversation shifts to whether celebrities influence public opinion, citing studies that suggest they have minimal impact on voting decisions, though they can affect their own popularity. Examples include Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris, which had mixed results in surveys. The hosts conclude that celebrities today serve more as mirrors of societal debates than as orientation aids, with smaller influencers potentially having closer community impact. The episode wraps up by reiterating that while celebrity political actions are highly visible, their practical influence is limited.
Listen to the show on