Very Bad Wizards · Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro

Episode 314: The In-Betweeny Place

August 12, 2025·1 hr 59 min·7 clips
A film analysis reveals how every single line in this acclaimed movie connects to create perfect narrative symmetry.
The episode opens with hosts Tamler Sommers and Dave Pizarro reluctantly discussing a viral controversy about Sidney Sweeney's jeans advertisement that sparked eugenics accusations online. They then tackle their main opening segment: a pseudonymous essay titled 'To Philosophers of Easy Virtue' published on a philosophy blog. The essay offers advice for academics engaging in sexual relationships within their field, distinguishing between 'strong players' and 'weak players.' Both hosts express deep discomfort with the essay's clinical approach to academic hookups, its cringeworthy language including terms like 'shagging' and 'shaggers require shaggies,' and its attempt to intellectualize sexual relationships. They particularly critique the author's claim that philosophy and sexuality are inherently intertwined, and her assertion that sexual experiences enhance philosophical work. The hosts find the essay's tone problematic, especially given the author's admission to filing sexual misconduct complaints and causing someone to lose their job. However, they acknowledge some valid points about 'weak players' in academia - those who can't handle rejection, expect professional favors to lead to intimacy, or assume casual encounters must become serious relationships. The discussion then transitions to Martin McDonagh's 2008 film 'In Bruges,' which the hosts approach with much more enthusiasm. They praise the film's intricate screenplay, noting how every line connects to later plot points without feeling forced or obvious. The movie stars Colin Farrell as Ray and Brendan Gleeson as Ken, two hitmen hiding out in Bruges, Belgium after a job gone wrong. The hosts analyze the film's rich moral themes including guilt, redemption, duty, honor, and the consequences of both major and minor choices. They discuss how the film functions as a Catholic meditation on purgatory, with Bruges serving as a liminal space between damnation and salvation. The conversation covers the film's exploration of what it means to be morally responsible for unintended consequences, the power of believing in someone despite their failures, and whether redemption is possible for those who have committed unforgivable acts. They praise Colin Farrell's performance as particularly moving, showing a character who is simultaneously childlike, clownish, and deeply troubled, yet somehow maintains the audience's sympathy throughout. The hosts also discuss Martin McDonagh's career trajectory from successful playwright to acclaimed filmmaker, noting his consistent themes across works like 'Seven Psychopaths,' 'Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri,' and 'The Banshees of Inisherin.' They analyze specific scenes from 'In Bruges,' including the opening tourist montage, the bell tower sequence, and encounters with American tourists, showing how seemingly minor interactions have major consequences later in the narrative.

As heard by us

A jeans-ad controversy gives way to a sharp, funny reading of In Bruges.

The episode opens with Sidney Sweeney's American Eagle jeans ad and the backlash around it, including the eugenics reading of the "good jeans" pun, then shifts into a lively take on In Bruges.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a funny, sharp take on a Sydney Sweeney jeans-ad controversy and a movie that hides grief inside jokes.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on