Unsolved Mysteries · dorothy holder

Lord Lucan Nanny Killer part 2

·39 min·2 clips
The bloodstains in the hallway, Corsair, and breakfast room were matched to groups A and B across multiple sites.
1. Unsolved Mysteries: Lord Lucan Nanny Killer part 2 continues the account of the Lord Lucan case after the first episode’s inquest material. 2. The hosts frame the discussion around Lord Lucan, Lady Lucan, Susan Maxwell Scott, and Professor Keith Simpson because each figure appears in the evidence and witness testimony. 3. The episode asks what the inquest evidence shows about the night of the attack and why Lucan later disappeared. 4. Keith Simpson testifies that Lady Lucan’s injuries included seven large lacerations on her scalp, bruising to her eye, and injuries to her palate and throat. 5. The hosts say Lucan was already “maneuvering other people,” sending messages and letters while he was disappearing. 6. Lucan’s mother, Kate, disputes the suggested 10.45 call time and says the call was closer to 10.30. 7. The inquest discussion notes that a person on foot could see into the basement, but a driver in a car could not. 8. Susan Maxwell Scott testifies about Lucan’s visit on 7 November and his claim that he interrupted a fight in the basement. 9. The episode says Lucan told Susan he slipped in blood, saw the nanny dead, and heard Lady Lucan accuse him of hiring someone to kill her. 10. A letter to Bill Shand Kidd is described as referring to “a traumatic night of unbelievable coincidences” and asking that the children know he cared about them. 11. The hosts focus on blood evidence from the stairs, the breakfast room, the garden, and the Ford Corsair, including group A and group B stains. 12. They note that Sandra Rivett’s blood group was B and Lady Lucan’s blood group was A. 13. The Ford Corsair is described as carrying Lady Lucan’s hair, blood, mixed blood types, and a torn writing pad page that matched Lucan’s note. 14. The episode says the inquest jury returned a verdict of murder by Lord Lucan after 31 minutes. 15. The hosts state that this was the last time an inquest jury could name a murderer, because the Criminal Law Act of 1977 changed that power. 16. Lucan’s flat is said to have contained his wallet, passport, driver’s license, and car keys after he vanished. 17. The tone is argumentative and explanatory, with the hosts repeatedly checking details from the transcript and challenging the contradictions in Lucan’s story. 18. The format mixes case narration, witness summaries, and present-day commentary about sightings, probate, and the 2016 death certificate. 19. People interested in British true-crime and inquest evidence. 20. Listeners who want a light recap without legal or forensic detail.

As heard by us

A skeptical re-litigation of Lucan's disappearance, built on testimony and disbelief.

Lord Lucan's disappearance is framed less as legend than as a hard argument over what the record can prove. The hosts return to Lady Lucan's injuries, the casualty officer's testimony, Lucan's protestations of innocence, and the impression that he tried to shape the story while…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want the Lord Lucan case re-argued with receipts, testimony, and no patience for loose theories.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on