Universal Disclosure Podcast (UAP / UFO Disclosure and our Belief Systems, Spirituality) · UFO Investigator Mike and Reverend Stu

UFO Chased by US Military caught on camera near San Diego (First 1/2 is Visually Based)

·27 min·1 clip
Mike uses aircraft-engine acoustics to argue the video contains only one helicopter.
1. Universal Disclosure Podcast examines Mike's investigation of a reddish-orange object filmed near San Diego on September 9, 2024. 2. Mike presents the footage as an investigator, while Stuart questions his analysis and asks about follow-up reporting. 3. The episode asks whether the object is an unidentified aircraft, a plasma-like phenomenon, or something associated with the military helicopter. 4. Mike points out that the object shows no visible one-second strobe pattern, unlike the aircraft and drones he describes. 5. Mike says the object appears as a solid light moving across the frame and away from the camera without visibly changing mass. 6. Mike connects the object's orange-red color to plasma-ball sightings he says he personally witnessed without hearing noise. 7. A flashing mountain light is identified as an anti-collision tower, and another brief light is identified as an airplane. 8. Mike argues that the recording does not contain a second helicopter engine, challenging the suggestion that one helicopter had gone dark behind another. 9. Mike uses FlightRadar and map data to place the event near military bases along the San Diego coast and the Mexico border. 10. FlightRadar shows the Nighthawk on September 10, 2024 in UTC while the local event date was September 9, 2024. 11. Mike identifies a United flight approaching San Diego at about 3,100 feet and says it does not match the object in the video. 12. Mike says the unidentified object may have been military, a non-transponding aircraft, or one of the reported plasma balls. 13. The witness reportedly described a more pronounced fiery color than the recording captures and had seen similar objects near the area. 14. Mike links the case to another report in which an object allegedly traveled about 60 or 80 miles to a specific location. 15. Mike classifies the filmed object as an unknown and says he leans toward an extraterrestrial possibility without claiming certainty. 16. Stuart describes the video as compelling, while Mike emphasizes that the investigation can still be wrong despite the available evidence. 17. The format combines repeated video playback, visual commentary, flight-data analysis, and a conversational interview about investigative methods. 18. The later discussion broadens to MUFON reporting, a Los Angeles case involving a retired law-enforcement witness, and possible future field research. 19. UAP viewers interested in aircraft tracking, MUFON, and witness evidence. 20. Listeners seeking conventional aviation analysis without paranormal speculation may skip it.
Listen to the show on