Truth, Investigations and Criminal Behavior · blangifm

The Charlie Kirk “Assassination” – Former NYPD Detective Squad Commander Breaks It Down

·32 min·2 clips

Mike argues that the roof footage, DNA, and cartridges point to one person, one shot, one kill.

Mike Blandreforte starts by introducing the Charlie Kirk assassination and telling listeners there is a lot to unpack. He says the episode is part one of a longer conversation. He also says a panel of retired NYPD detectives is coming soon. The stated goal is simple: talk with no politics and no bullshit. Blandreforte keeps the discussion tied to facts and evidence. He places the event on September 10, 2025, and says that around 12:23 in the afternoon Kirk was holding an outdoor event on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. He identifies Kirk as the founder of Turning Point USA. From there he moves into the reported investigative picture. The discussion treats the killing as a targeted political assassination. Blandreforte says the case is being pursued as a death penalty matter. He notes that a death penalty prosecution raises the stakes on both sides. He says the prosecution has to meet additional criteria. He also says the defense has to fight to keep its client off death row. From there he turns to physical evidence. He mentions the rifle. He mentions the cartridges. He points to reported inscriptions on some of the casings. One of those inscriptions is described as politically hostile toward the victim. He uses that detail to argue that the act showed political animus. He then shifts to the suspect’s reported behavior before the shooting. He says Robinson tracked Kirk’s public appearances. He says Robinson studied campus maps. He says there were posts suggesting intent to commit violence. Blandreforte connects that to warning signs often seen in violent offenders. He brings up active shooter cases and school shootings as examples. He says people often miss warning signs or hesitate to report them. He tells listeners to take threats seriously when someone says what they are going to do. He widens the discussion into behavioral patterns. He says he plans to talk more about school shooters and active shooters in future episodes. He returns to the idea that violent offenders often leave clues. The episode keeps asking what the evidence shows and what can be proven. That skeptical loop drives the monologue. Near the end, he says the show will return to Tyler Robinson as the case unfolds. He says there will be another deep dive into criminal behavior. He closes by promising a future episode with the detective panel. He also says there may be one more wrap-up episode after that. The overall presentation is conversational, procedural, and focused on the investigative record.

As heard by us

A steady, evidence-first account of a politically charged killing that stays close to what can be supported.

It treats Charlie Kirk's killing as a matter for evidence, not speculation, and follows the public record, the physical clues, and the conspiracy claims that still need to be sorted out.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Need a grounded read on the Charlie Kirk case before the theories take over?

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Truth, Investigations and Criminal Behavior