True Crime News: The Podcast · True Crime News

Suspect leads police to missing teen’s dead body; Savannah Guthrie’s mother disappears – TCN Sidebar

February 6, 2026·33 min·1 clip

A conflict of interest requires both a personal connection AND proof that it influenced the case.

This episode of the True Crime News Sidebar, hosted by criminal defense attorney Joshua Ritter, analyzes three developing legal cases with legal analyst Terry Austin. They first examine the high-profile prosecution of Tyler Robinson, the alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk in Provo, Utah. Robinson's defense is seeking to have the entire Utah County Attorney's Office removed due to a potential conflict of interest. The conflict stems from a prosecutor's 18-year-old daughter being at the rally where Kirk was killed and reportedly placing the first call about the incident to her father's office. The defense argues this connection created bias, while the prosecution maintains the daughter was not a witness or victim and it did not influence the decision to seek the death penalty. The hosts debate the merits of the motion, with Austin seeing it as a "50-50" argument that could cause procedural delays beneficial to the defense. The second case involves the death of 17-year-old Haley Busby in Fishers, Indiana, after suspect Tyler Thomas led police to her body. Thomas, a 39-year-old man who met Busby through online gaming, was initially charged with pandering obscenity and evidence tampering under a $1.5 million bond but has not yet been charged with murder. Ritter and Austin speculate that authorities are awaiting forensic and autopsy results before filing homicide charges. The conversation shifts to the victim's parents advocating for "Haley's Law," a new alert system for missing persons who don't meet strict Amber Alert criteria but still face credible danger. The final segment covers the alleged kidnapping of Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of NBC anchor Savannah Guthrie, from her Tucson home. Authorities found signs of forced entry and have received ransom notes demanding cryptocurrency, though they have not confirmed their authenticity. The hosts analyze a carefully orchestrated video statement from the Guthrie family, interpreting it as a call for "proof of life" directed at the kidnappers. Austin notes the unusual silence from the perpetrators and the puzzling motive behind targeting Nancy Guthrie. A surprising claim is that in the Kirk case, the defense initially argued the prosecution was so biased they shouldn't even be allowed to argue the conflict-of-interest motion, requesting the state Attorney General step in instead. The judge in that case is described as exceptionally meticulous, even personally questioning a courtroom videographer about procedural rules. In the Guthrie case, the family's public statement avoided dismissing the ransom notes, subtly treating them as potentially legitimate to open a channel with the kidnappers. The tone is conversational and analytical, blending legal expertise with current events commentary as two attorneys dissect procedural strategies and investigative decisions. The style is educational, breaking down complex legal motions and police tactics for a general audience. This episode will appeal to listeners who enjoy deep dives into the legal maneuvering behind high-profile crime headlines and speculative analysis of ongoing investigations. It might be less engaging for those seeking resolved narratives or graphic true crime storytelling, as it focuses on unfolding procedural developments.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from True Crime News: The Podcast