Thinking Fellows · 1517 Podcasts

Did Martin Luther Start a New Religion?

February 18, 2025·50 min·4 clips
Did Martin Luther invent a new religion, sparking outrage from Catholics over scriptural disputes?
This episode of the Thinking Fellows podcast examines whether Martin Luther started a new religion. Host Caleb Keith is joined by regular fellows Adam Francisco, Bruce Hillman, and Scott Keith. The conversation is prompted by recent online criticisms from Roman Catholics directed at apologist Wes Huff and commentator Joe Rogan. The fellows reference a specific grievance concerning Huff's characterization of the biblical canon, where he stated Catholics added books to Scripture. They note the diverse reactions from within Catholicism itself, humorously observing the variety of Catholic perspectives despite the term "catholic" meaning universal. Caleb Keith introduces the term "Protestant derangement syndrome" to describe a particular intensity of criticism they perceive. The discussion centers on Luther's intent, which the fellows argue was reformation rather than invention, aiming to correct perceived errors within the existing church. They contrast this with the common accusation that Luther fabricated a new faith. The episode likely delves into historical theological distinctions between Protestant and Catholic doctrines of authority and salvation. A key insight is the fellows' view that Catholic critics often misunderstand or misrepresent Lutheran theology and its historical claims. The conversation suggests that the debate is less about historical fact and more about ongoing theological identity and polemics. The tone is informal and collegial, featuring inside jokes and coined phrases like "Protestant derangement syndrome." The style is a conversational roundtable among knowledgeable insiders, blending historical analysis with contemporary cultural commentary. Listeners interested in Protestant-Catholic debates, Reformation history, or evangelical apologetics will find this episode engaging. Those seeking a strictly academic or neutral historical treatment might find the perspective too partisan.
Listen to the show on