Fakertarians Episode 60: A SovCit!

·1 hr 41 min·5 clips

Host John Hudak asks David Fletz if he identifies as a sovereign citizen, probing a controversial legal identity.

The episode begins with host John Hudak introducing guest David Fletz, who has been interacting on Facebook. John immediately asks David if he identifies as a sovereign citizen, setting the tone for a debate. David references SEDM.org as a source for his views, describing it as a nonprofit that others criticize. John questions the site's trustworthiness, leading to a discussion on legal arguments. David challenges John to provide case law disproving sovereign citizen tactics, and John counters by asking for appellate court victories. They examine testimonials on SEDM.org, with John noting they lack judicial citations. John explains that prosecutors often reduce charges due to caseloads, not legal merit, using traffic tickets as an example. David mentions a Michigan individual who fights tickets successfully, but John argues this is due to procedural convenience. The conversation delves into rules of civil and criminal procedure, with David claiming tickets omit required information like addresses. John responds that minor errors rarely lead to dismissals unless there's prejudice. They discuss the right to an attorney in minor cases, with John explaining state-specific exceptions. David brings up oaths under civil procedure, and John cites a Michigan statute about sworn complaints. The debate touches on perjury, expert testimony, and judicial overreach. John analogizes sovereign citizen arguments to seeking 'cheat codes' in a legal system, arguing attorneys would use them if valid. David suggests judges create illusions of rights, but John counters that appeals exist for errors. The episode concludes with acknowledgments as the tech guy needs to leave, leaving the core disagreement unresolved.

As heard by us

A volatile episode where Libertarian Party rules collide with sovereignty arguments over traffic tickets.

This single-episode review frames a tense, unruly conversation where Libertarian Party procedure and traffic-court sovereignty arguments keep pressing on the same question: who gets to claim authority, and on what terms.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Want a libertarian party fight that somehow ends up arguing over citation addresses? Press play.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Think Liberty Network