The Taiwan Take · Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音

LGBT + Equality: Jennifer Lu (Marriage Equality Coalition Taiwan)

·35 min·3 clips
On the one-year anniversary of Taiwan's same-sex marriage law, Jennifer Liu discusses the ongoing fight for true equality.
This episode of The Taiwan Take features host William Yang interviewing Jennifer Lu, Chief Coordinator of the Marriage Equality Coalition Taiwan, on the one-year anniversary of Taiwan's same-sex marriage law. Jennifer Lu is a social worker and feminist author with over 50 years of experience in Taiwan's LGBT movement. The conversation traces the movement's history and examines the current legal landscape following the landmark legislation. Lu details the community development and activism of the 1990s that laid the movement's foundation. She discusses Taiwan's first pride parade in 2003 as a key milestone when the movement gained public momentum. The interview covers the significant challenges posed by the subsequent rise of organized opposition voices. Lu explains that while same-sex couples can now legally marry, the fight for full equality continues. A primary insight is that the current law still contains discriminatory provisions compared to heterosexual marriage. Lu specifies that transnational same-sex marriages face restrictive legal hurdles not applied to other couples. She argues the movement must now shift from seeking marriage rights to pursuing comprehensive equality in all family laws. The conversation reveals the strategic use of both street activism and legislative lobbying over decades. The interview highlights how conservative opposition successfully framed the debate around traditional family values to sway public opinion. Lu describes the movement's adaptation to counter well-funded opposition campaigns through public education. A memorable point is her reflection on the long-term, intergenerational nature of social movement work spanning over 50 years. She emphasizes that legal change is merely one step within a broader cultural struggle for acceptance. The tone is educational and conversational, structured as a reflective historical interview. The style is direct and focused on policy details and movement strategy rather than personal narrative. Listeners interested in social movement history, comparative LGBT rights, or post-legalization activism in Asia would find this episode valuable. Those seeking a debate on the morality of same-sex marriage or a purely celebratory account might find its analytical focus less engaging.
Listen to the show on