The Sonia Elijah Podcast · Investigative journalism, forensic style

People's Vaccine Inquiry: Unveiling Hidden Harms & Censored Facts

·1 hr 7 min·4 clips

Craig says the 14-day rule and early immune suppression created a false picture of vaccine protection.

1. The Sonia Elijah Podcast episode focuses on the People's Vaccine Inquiry and the English COVID Inquiry's vaccine module. 2. Dr. Claire Craig is introduced as a diagnostic pathologist, and Sonia Elijah is the host asking about the inquiry process and vaccine evidence. 3. The episode asks why the vaccine module has been delayed and what the People's Vaccine Inquiry is trying to put in public view. 4. Claire Craig says Heart was invited to give a statement to the English COVID Inquiry alongside the Perseus Group, the Children's Vaccine Group, and the UK Medical Freedom Alliance. 5. She says those groups spent significant time preparing evidence before the module was postponed, first indefinitely and later to January 2025. 6. Craig says the groups rewrote the submissions so the public could access the material without the legal language of the inquiry process. 7. She says the inquiry now feels like a platform for people who caused harm to defend their decisions. 8. Craig contrasts that with the Scottish Inquiry, which she says is hearing from real people whose lives were turned upside down or destroyed. 9. She says the English inquiry has not addressed whether lockdowns worked and will not address whether vaccines worked. 10. Craig says the inquiry's terms of reference were inadequate from the outset. 11. She says there appears to be a push not to hear from a single unvaccinated person. 12. Craig describes the People's Vaccine Inquiry as a set of filmed interviews, each around 10 minutes, edited by Will Jones of The Daily Skeptic. 13. She says the project is linked to the Hope Accord, a four-paragraph statement calling for suspension of the products. 14. The Hope Accord asks for thorough investigation, including post-mortems with the right testing to assess contribution to death. 15. Craig says the accord also calls for proper support for injured people who have been left at long COVID clinics. 16. She says the final point is a return to precautionary principle, informed consent, bodily autonomy, and medical ethics. 17. Craig says the safety concerns began before a single injection because the products were novel and had not got past phase two in prior work. 18. She says harm detection failed because the available systems were designed around a narrow rare-condition model, while the reports involved many organs and widespread effects. 19. The conversation is direct and combative, with Sonia Elijah repeatedly pressing on inquiry design, evidence, and efficacy claims. 20. The episode will suit listeners who want inquiry politics and vaccine-safety arguments; it will not suit listeners looking for a neutral process overview.

As heard by us

A document-minded challenge to pandemic handling, autopsies, and what was left unexamined.

The episode tracks Dr. Claire Craig through the logic behind the People's Vaccine Inquiry: why a parallel group of professionals felt the English COVID Inquiry needed another angle, and how evidence kept colliding with procedural limits.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Press play if you want a hard-edged conversation about the People's Vaccine Inquiry, where a diagnostic pathologist walks through autopsies, tissue-retention rules, and why she thinks oversight has been weakened.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Sonia Elijah Podcast