The Sonia Elijah Podcast · Investigative journalism, forensic style

Exclusive Interview: DNA Contamination in COVID Shots Amidst Retraction Wars and Cyber Censorship

·1 hr 41 min·6 clips

Sonia Elijah opens by introducing Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose, and David Speaker and asking them to begin with the earlier work on DNA fragments in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine vials. She steers the discussion back to the 2023 preprint and then to the later published paper at the center of the current dispute. The guests correct the timeline as they go, including the difference between the preprint and the published work. McKernan says he was the first to discover the issue in April 2023. The group explains that they initially worked from anonymous files and that one of the main objections they heard was that those files could have been contaminated. They reject that objection and treat the source material as legitimate. From there the conversation moves to their contact with David and Maria. The guests say they have been writing repeatedly about what is happening and about the people involved. They frame the paper as having been brought under investigation for the wrong reasons. Speaker says he filed complaints in July. He says he was described in unprofessional terms and dismissed as anti-vax and pseudoscientific. Elijah interrupts to slow the pace and point listeners toward an article about the dispute. The episode references Retraction Watch and a linked review that the guests say readers can inspect for themselves. Speaker argues that the review used inflammatory language. The conversation says journals are not supposed to allow ad hominem attacks in peer review. One thread of the discussion is that some journals are now stripping authors and institutions from review materials because of that problem. Elijah keeps pushing the guests to explain the process, not just the outrage. The call itself freezes several times, and she pauses to handle the technical problems on air. Those glitches make the exchange feel less like a polished interview and more like a working record. The episode keeps circling back to who wrote what, who reviewed it, and who had access to the material. It also keeps returning to the gap between first discovery and the harder work of follow-up. By the end, the guests argue that careful confirmatory work is what actually brings change, even if the original discovery gets the headlines.

As heard by us

A procedural fight over DNA findings, peer review, and journal conduct.

The episode stays anchored in dates, papers, and review steps as Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose, and David Speaker work through the 2023 paper on DNA fragments in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine vials and the later complaint over how it was reviewed.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Track the paper trail behind a scientific dispute over a 2023 preprint and a later journal investigation.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Sonia Elijah Podcast