The Philosophy and Therapy Podcast · John T Maier

#31: Elizabeth Schechter on Plurals, Dissociative Identity Disorder, and Personal Identity

·57 min·3 clips

Tulpagenic systems can report headmates whose actions and emotions still feel “not mine” despite shared awareness.

1. The Philosophy in Therapy podcast episode on Elizabeth Schechter’s paper “Introducing Plurals” centers on plurals, dissociative identity disorder, and personal identity. 2. John T. Meyer introduces himself as a psychotherapist in private practice in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and a philosopher working on agency, value, and language, while Elizabeth Schechter is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Maryland College Park and a member of the Brain and Behavior Institute. 3. The episode asks what a plural is, how that concept overlaps with DID, and whether plural self-understanding has metaphysical implications about persons. 4. Schechter defines a plural as a human being who experiences themself as multiple people sharing one head, with “head” left deliberately ambiguous between skull, brain, and mind. 5. She contrasts plurals with singlets, whom she describes as human beings who take themselves to be the sole person in their head. 6. She says the overlap between plurality and DID is substantial, but it is not perfect in either direction. 7. The diagnostic criteria for DID include distress and impairment, while some plurals do not experience their systemhood as disordered. 8. Schechter says some plurals have no DID at all and some systems arise through tulpamancy, an intentional practice aimed at creating new sentient beings called tulpas. 9. She distinguishes traumagenic systems from tulpagenic systems and notes that both can report similar phenomenology, including experiences that feel “not mine.” 10. The discussion turns to whether plurality should be compared to historical diagnostic categories such as homosexuality in DSM-1. 11. Schechter says plurals would likely accept only a partial analogy, because some DID-related problems involve internal conflict or amnesia within a system. 12. She rejects the idea that systemhood itself is pathological and compares a dysfunctional system to a dysfunctional family. 13. Meyer asks why etiology matters at all, and Schechter says the term can sound medicalized even when she means only a causal history. 14. She says some plural identities may arise from trauma, tulpamancy, or possibly spontaneous development linked to neurodiversity. 15. Schechter uses transgender identity as an analogy, arguing that statistically unusual cases can make the etiology of ordinary identity more visible. 16. She says talking to plurals also made her ask about the etiology of singlet identity. 17. The episode then separates psychosocial identity from metaphysical personal identity, with Schechter using examples like identifying as a lawyer or as a Honda driver. 18. She says plural identity appears to make a metaphysical claim that there really are multiple persons associated with one plural human being, which would rule out animalism if true. 19. The conversation is technical, example-driven, and tightly framed around definitions, diagnostic criteria, and philosophical distinctions. 20. Listeners interested in philosophy of mind, psychotherapy, DID, or identity theory will get the most from it; listeners wanting light conversation or a purely clinical overview may skip it.

As heard by us

A careful conversation about plurality, identity, and where philosophy meets clinical reality.

Elizabeth Schechter and John T. Meyer treat plurality, dissociative identity disorder, and the question of one self with unusual patience. The discussion earns its weight by keeping animalism, psychological continuity, and plural self-understanding distinct, so the ideas stay…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want a slow, serious conversation about what a self is, press play.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Philosophy and Therapy Podcast