The Philosophy and Therapy Podcast · John T Maier

#30: Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien on Diagnosis and the DSM

·1 hr 22 min·5 clips

Helen Longino’s social objectivity keeps empirical adequation while rejecting the value-free ideal.

John T. Meyer opens by placing Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien’s work at the intersection of philosophy, psychiatry, and ethics. He sketches her focus on mental disorder, medicalization, epigenetics, and revising the DSM before shifting the conversation to an older article on social objectivity. From there, the discussion widens into broader concerns about psychiatric classification. Meyer presses a familiar worry: if diagnosis becomes more socially objective, does it become less scientific? That question sets up the episode’s central tension. Gagné-Julien answers by separating social objectivity from any simple move away from the empirical world. She places the issue within Longino’s critical contextual empiricism rather than treating it as a free pass for anything goes. The interview then works through the fear of relativism. It also takes up the related concern that values might crowd out evidence in psychiatry. Gagné-Julien argues that the real task is not to remove values, but to understand how they enter inquiry and how they can still be checked against the world. The DSM serves as the concrete test case for that argument. Meyer frames it as a provisional scientific tool and raises the idea that some people see it as a step toward a more fully scientific psychiatry. Gagné-Julien takes that idea seriously without fully signing on to it. She treats the DSM as a place where scientific aims, social purposes, and practical classification are already mixed together. The conversation keeps returning to what objectivity means when the objects of study are human beings in social and clinical settings. It also asks what it would mean for diagnosis to be more just without losing touch with reality. The episode stays attentive to the listener who wants this debate to matter beyond theory. Meyer keeps bringing the discussion back to lived experience and to whether philosophical tools can actually improve care for people who live with mental illness. Gagné-Julien leaves room for that practical question rather than treating it as a side note. The result is a careful interview that makes the conceptual stakes of diagnosis easier to see.

As heard by us

A careful DSM conversation about objectivity, diagnosis, and the values psychiatry cannot avoid.

The episode treats diagnosis as both a philosophical and practical problem. Anne-Marie Gagne-Julien and John T. Meyer keep the focus on the DSM, social objectivity, and the tension between staying tied to the empirical world and admitting that values shape classification.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a careful DSM conversation about social objectivity, relativism, and what psychiatry is trying to do today.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Philosophy and Therapy Podcast