The Morality of Everyday Things: An Everyday Philosophy Podcast · Ant and Jake

How do we know we're not living in the matrix? Solipsism and another classic philosophy film

·27 min·1 clip

Descartes imagines an evil demon deceiving him about the sky, earth, colors, shapes, sounds, and his own body.

1. The Morality of Everyday Things episode, 'How do we know we're not living in the matrix? Solipsism and another classic philosophy film,' links The Matrix to solipsism and the Brain in a Vat. 2. Anthony hosts with Jacob, and Jacob handles the definitions of solipsism, epistemology, and Descartes' argument because the episode keeps circling back to certainty. 3. The episode asks what can be known if the blue pill means staying in 'comfortable ignorance' and the red pill means learning the truth. 4. Anthony says the red-pill question feels like a life question about being 'ignorant and contented' versus knowing more. 5. The hosts use The Matrix to explain the idea that perceived reality could be a simulation created by machines. 6. They distinguish The Matrix from solipsism by saying solipsism claims only one's own mind is sure to exist. 7. They explain the Brain in a Vat as a scenario where a person's brain is suspended in life-sustaining liquid and connected to a supercomputer. 8. In that scenario, the computer would simulate reality and supply electrical impulses matching normal sensory experience. 9. Jacob says the Brain in a Vat is a modernized version of Descartes' evil demon thought experiment. 10. The episode names other historical parallels, including the Hindu Maya illusion, Plato's allegory of the cave, and Zhuangzi dreaming he was a butterfly. 11. Descartes' 1641 Meditations on First Philosophy is presented as a search for a starting point from which to reason. 12. The hosts quote Descartes imagining 'the sky, the air, the earth, colors, shapes, sounds, and all external things' as delusions. 13. They say the method is systematic doubt, because Descartes wants something he cannot doubt. 14. The key remainder is the act of doubting itself, which Descartes treats as proof that thinking is occurring. 15. The Latin phrase 'Cogito Ergo Sum' is discussed as the familiar form of 'I think therefore I am.' 16. The episode notes a critique from Pierre Gassendi that Descartes may be assuming an 'I' before proving it. 17. The hosts then move into subjective idealism, with George Berkeley named as an influential proponent. 18. Their style is conversational and argumentative, with repeated interruptions, corrections, and jokes about pronunciation. 19. People interested in The Matrix, Descartes, and philosophical skepticism would likely enjoy this episode. 20. People wanting a light entertainment recap without philosophy terms may skip it.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Morality of Everyday Things: An Everyday Philosophy Podcast