The Lawfare Podcast · The Lawfare Institute

Lawfare Daily: The Pentagon Designates Anthropic as a Supply Chain Risk

March 3, 2026·54 min·5 clips

The Pentagon threatens to invoke the Defense Production Act to force Anthropic to remove AI usage restrictions, sparking a legal showdown.

Lawfare is a national security law podcast edited by Benjamin Wittes, who hosts this live episode recorded on March 2nd alongside senior editor Alan Rosenstein, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School who describes himself as having gone from zero to around 45 or 50 on defense procurement law over a single weekend. The episode opens with a sharp formulation of the contradiction in the Pentagon's position: it is completely insane to simultaneously say a product is so important we are going to force you to give it to us, so safe that we will use it in active military engagement, and so dangerous that we are going to burn you to the ground. Anthropic is described as having been at the forefront of AI labs in working with the US government, including on classified military systems. Last summer, the company signed a Pentagon contract expanding the military's use of its Claude AI systems on classified networks for military purposes. The contract included two Anthropic-imposed red lines: no mass surveillance of Americans and no fully autonomous military operations. The Department of Defense agreed to those terms at the time. Then in January, Secretary Hegseth issued a memorandum requiring that all military AI contracts permit all lawful uses of the systems, without company-imposed restrictions. Because Anthropic's red lines restricted uses that Hegseth's memo required be permitted, Anthropic was designated a supply chain risk. Rosenstein explains the procurement law framework, notes that the DOD can change its guidelines without violating the letter of previous contracts, and raises the concern that companies acting in good faith on prior agreements have no stable footing in this environment. The designation also opens questions about what autonomous weapons commitments mean when the contracting party can unilaterally redefine the permitted use envelope.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Lawfare Podcast