The Intrinsic Value Podcast - The Investor’s Podcast Network · The Investor's Podcast Network

TIVP025: Smith & Wesson (SWBI): Deep Value — Locked and Loaded w/ Daniel Mahncke & Shawn O’Malley

·1 hr 14 min·5 clips

Smith & Wesson's management bought back shares at peak prices, leaving the company with only $26 million in cash.

Sean opens by acknowledging the emotional charge of the investment, noting that Smith & Wesson was founded in 1854, that its lever action rifle shaped the American West, and that the revolver version gained commercial scale during the Civil War. The company trades on NASDAQ and still manufactures under both the Smith & Wesson and M&P brands, making pistols, revolvers, rifles, and noise suppressors for firearm enthusiasts, collectors, hunters, law enforcement, and military customers, with roughly 95% of sales in North America. Pistols represent 40-45% of total US gun sales, and Smith & Wesson holds about 20% of that market, meaning pistols can represent up to 75% of their revenues in up cycles. The business model is purely manufacturing: guns are produced at four facilities across Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, and Tennessee, shipped to a Missouri warehouse, and sold wholesale to commercial distributors, with roughly 50% of sales flowing through just five distributors. In 2020, the company spun off its American Outdoor Brands division — which sold hunting gear, outdoor grills, and accessories — as a separate public company, leaving SWBI as a pure-play firearms manufacturer and allowing the outdoor brand to be valued without the ESG drag of the gun association. Sean uses this as a textbook example of the spinoff value-creation pattern described in Joel Greenblatt's You Can Be a Stock Market Genius: distributed shares are often sold regardless of fundamentals by investors who neither wanted nor can hold gun stocks, creating temporary mispricing. The investment thesis rests on mean reversion in the firearm demand cycle — Sean notes gun sales are heavily cyclical, driven by political events and policy concerns — with the current trough suggesting the stock is trading below normalized earnings power. The primary risks are permanent structural decline (which Sean does not believe applies), time cost and opportunity cost if mean reversion takes too long, and the absence of a specific catalyst. Management incentive alignment is poor: compensation is benchmarked against adjusted operating earnings metrics that strip out legitimate expenses, with no per-share metrics used, which Sean identifies as a red flag parallel to every negative characteristic in William Thorndike's The Outsiders. Daniel adds that the most dangerous investment situations are often ones where the stock looks cheap for a reason the analyst has not fully identified.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Intrinsic Value Podcast - The Investor’s Podcast Network