The History of Byzantium · [email protected]

Episode 346 - What If?

March 24, 2026·39 min·3 clips

What if Justinian had been overthrown during the Nica Riots, altering the course of Roman history?

1. The History of Byzantium episode 346 asks the question: which turning points of Byzantine history were truly decisive, and which were contingent accidents that could have gone differently? 2. Host Robin presents himself as a solo narrator who has reached the end of the Byzantine story and is now addressing listener-submitted counterfactual questions that flooded in after the fall of Constantinople in 1453. 3. The episode's core thesis is that most Byzantine disasters were not inevitable — they depended on specific contingent events — but that the Fourth Crusade of 1204 stands apart as the one truly irreversible catastrophe. 4. Robin scores the Nika Riots of 532 at 6 out of 10, arguing Justinian's successors would have cancelled all western reconquests and avoided draining the empire before the Persian and Arab crises of the 7th century. 5. He acknowledges a counterargument: Justinian's elimination of the Vandals and Goths removed threats that could have worsened later disasters, capping the score at 6. 6. The execution of Emperor Maurice in 602 scores an 8 out of 10, but Robin revises his earlier view that this was an open-and-shut case, now arguing Maurice was leaving a very difficult situation for his five sons and civil war remained likely. 7. Robin explains that the rise of Islam may have occurred regardless of whether the 20-year Roman-Persian war happened, because religious syncretism in Arabia was already underway and both empires had withdrawn funding from the Syrian desert tribes. 8. The Battle of Nicephorus I against the Bulgars in 811, where the emperor was ambushed and killed in the Haemus mountains after burning their capital Pliska, scores only a 4 out of 10 because the Romans recovered and eventually conquered Bulgaria anyway. 9. Manzikert in 1071 scores a 9 out of 10 because Alp Arslan had no interest in war with Rome — he only wanted Armenian border fortresses — making the battle a highly contingent accident whose immediate consequences (civil war, bankruptcy, demoralization) were uniquely destructive. 10. Robin argues that without Manzikert there would likely have been no First Crusade, and without the First Crusade there would have been no Fourth Crusade — but he cautions against treating this chain as inevitable, comparing it to attributing the 2026 financial system entirely to the American economic panic of 1893. 11. The siege of Antioch in 1097 scores a 5 out of 10 — Latin-controlled Antioch contributed little to crusader security, and Roman-held Antioch combined with Armenian Cilicia could have created a Christian stronghold protecting the Levant. 12. The accidental death of John II Komnenos in 1143, from a poisoned arrow wound, scores only a 3 out of 10 because Robin is not convinced John could have taken Antioch anyway, though his survival might have prevented the fall of Edessa and the Second Crusade. 13. The loss of the Roman fleet in 1184 — stolen or scuttled by Norman admiral Margaritone while Byzantine marines were ashore in Cyprus — scores a 5 out of 10 as a contingent disaster that left the empire unable to project naval power. 14. The Fourth Crusade scores a perfect 10 out of 10: Robin argues the simultaneous loss of Constantinople's city, money, and aura was irreversible, unlike every earlier setback which allowed some form of recovery. 15. The rebellion of John Kantakouzenos scores a 4 out of 10, not because the damage wasn't severe — he surrendered northern Greece to Serbia and invited the Turks into Europe as mercenaries — but because Robin suspects other Palaiologan figures would have made similar decisions. 16. Robin argues the most surprising historical lesson is that the Byzantine Empire looked strong and healthy in 1180, and was essentially finished 24 years later — a speed of collapse that defies the slow-decline narrative most historians apply. 17. The episode is structured as a solo lecture with a rating framework, maintaining an analytical but conversational tone; Robin frequently revises positions he held earlier in the podcast run, citing changed thinking. 18. Robin addresses listener questions throughout, including from listeners identified by initials (N.T., E.B., C.W.B., J.T.L.) who asked what-if questions about the Plague of Justinian, Basil II's succession, Manuel Komnenos's strategy, and Ottoman counterfactuals. 19. Listeners interested in medieval political contingency, Byzantine military history, and counterfactual methodology will find this episode well-suited to their interests. 20. Listeners seeking narrative storytelling, primary source analysis, or coverage of a single event in depth will find this episode too survey-oriented.

As heard by us

A measured counterfactual look at how Byzantium's worst turns compounded.

This episode looks at the hinge points where Byzantine history might have broken differently, starting with John's death, moving through Manuel Komnenos's long effort to keep the empire tied to the wider crusading world, and ending with the loss of the Roman fleet in Cyprus.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Want to see how one fleet loss can change an empire's future?

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The History of Byzantium