The History of Ancient Greece · Ryan Stitt

109 Sokrates

March 21, 2022·1 hr 47 min·2 clips

The Socratic method uses questions to expose contradictions and reveal the limitations of claimed knowledge

The episode treats Socrates as both a historical figure and a problem of transmission. He is presented as the central figure behind a long philosophical legacy, but not as a writer we can simply quote. The record comes through students. Plato and Xenophon carry most of it, while Antisthenes, Ascinius of Svetis, Euclides of Megara, Phaedo of Elea, and Simon the Shoemaker survive with very little of their writing remaining. Their material is grouped under the label Socratic dialogues, which the episode describes as reports of conversations or thought exercises involving Socrates. That leads to the Socratic question: how much of these texts is historical Socrates, and how much is Plato or another disciple using Socrates as a vehicle? The episode does not try to solve that cleanly. It notes that many scholars think Plato sometimes puts his own ideas into Socrates' mouth, and that the result can be pushed too far for particular purposes. Socrates then comes into view as a teacher whose influence ran through his students and into later schools of philosophy. The episode’s interest is not only biographical. It is argumentative too. Socrates’ notion of virtue is tied to knowledge, so acting well means acting with understanding. From there, the episode develops his critique of politics by analogy. An ignorant ruler is compared to an ignorant doctor, and the point is that expertise matters when lives and decisions are at stake. The episode is careful not to turn this into a simple doctrine about philosopher-kings. It says that Socrates very likely did not hold the form of that idea found in Plato’s Republic. What he did resist was amateur government, the kind of system in which any opinion counted for as much as any other and a volatile assembly could be moved by rhetoric. He is shown asking why people without genuine knowledge should make life and death decisions that affect the polis. The episode also avoids making him into a straightforward anti-democrat. It suggests that his distrust was broader than one regime type and that he may have undercut monarchy or oligarchy just as readily if he had lived under them. His single public office gets special attention. As epistates of the ecclesia on the day of the trial of the generals at Arginusae in 406 BC, he refused to put an illegal measure to a vote and held to the law even when that was awkward. That matters because it shows him as a man of principle inside the city’s institutions, not just a critic outside them. The political aftermath makes his reputation messier still. He had no formal role in the oligarchic revolutions of Athens' final war years, but one of his former students, Critias, became a leading figure among the Thirty Tyrants. Since Critias had been his student and Socrates remained in Athens through the period, the public later linked him to the Thirty anyway. The episode then carries that association into the democratic restoration, showing how memory and politics harden into reputation. The larger point is that Socrates helped move Greek thought from the pre-Socratics' attention to the natural world into the abstract terrain of ethics and morality. Different schools claimed his inheritance, but they did not agree on what it meant. That disagreement becomes evidence of how open his legacy was. One line of descent could stress one moral discipline, while another condemned it. The result is a foundation for Western philosophy that is also a field of dispute. The episode finally places that intellectual inheritance against the backdrop of the Peloponnesian War, treating the strain of the war as part of the history of ideas rather than just the history of battles. It ends by preparing the transition to Xenophon and the Ten Thousand, where a more famous student and a pan-Hellenic campaign into the Persian Empire will take the stage.

As heard by us

Socrates as a source problem and a political one, with the philosophy kept grounded.

The episode treats Socrates as someone known mostly through other people's accounts, and that is where it has the most grip. It stays with the split between Plato, Xenophon, and the thinner surviving material from other students, then uses that uncertainty to ask what virtue,…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

When you want Socrates without the marble pedestal.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The History of Ancient Greece