The Golden Age of Murder: A True Crime Podcast · Golden Age of Murder

The Pacific Corridor

·2 hr 22 min

The hosts begin by arguing that the Pacific Northwest deserves more of the grim reputation usually handed to California. They point to the Seattle area as a concentration point and then widen the view to Washington state more broadly. The numbers they cite are striking, and they use them to frame the region as historically saturated with violence. That is not left as an abstract statistic. They connect it to logging camps, to the origin of the term skid row, and to a social landscape shaped by violence, desperation, isolation, runaway homelessness, alcoholism, and drug addiction. They keep returning to the corridor from northern California up through Seattle and toward Vancouver. The geography matters because, in the hosts' telling, the crimes do not come from nowhere. They grow out of highways, marginal economies, and the movement of vulnerable people through places where they can vanish. Women who go missing are described as less than dead, which is blunt but also fits the show's refusal to dress the subject up. The tone stays grave, though not in a polished documentary way. It sounds like two people who have read deeply and are still trying to make sense of why the pattern keeps showing up. The conversation then narrows from region to method. The hosts talk through how some killers escalate over time. They separate the original act of disposing of evidence from a later stage where strangulation and direct attack become more central. That shift matters to them because it suggests a process, not just one impulsive event. They treat the killer's behavior as something learned and refined, which is bleak but useful for understanding the pattern. The discussion does not stay clinical, though. It keeps circling back to personality, instinct, and the practical realities of finding victims. That leads them into the strange ordinariness of the men themselves. One of the more telling passages is about the difference between being able to approach someone in a transactional setting and being able to seduce or charm a crowd. The hosts compare that to bigger, more socially fluent predators and note that this figure is not one of them. He is not a showman. He is not a drinker who becomes the center of attention. He is the kind of man who can operate in a narrow, ugly context because he does not need warmth or charisma to do it. The episode also takes a practical investigative turn. The hosts describe a computer system used to analyze links between victims and suspects. That system surfaces a name, and the fit is unsettling because the man sounds ordinary in the way many serial predators do when stripped of myth. He is described as friendly, attached to a pickup truck, and active around the strip. The episode revisits an attempted strangulation near Seattle airport in July 1980, including his claim of self-defense, and uses that to show how the case starts to come together around patterns rather than isolated incidents. The hosts seem interested in the way these cases only become legible once enough fragments are stacked together. Even with the grim material, the episode stays conversational rather than judicial. The hosts speculate, qualify, compare, and backtrack in the same breath. They are comfortable drawing lines between place, class, masculinity, and murder without pretending those lines are neat. That gives the episode a rough intelligence. It also means the pacing can loosen at times, especially when the conversation drifts into broader social theory, but that looseness is part of the show's texture rather than a flaw. The closing stretch turns reflective. The hosts step back from the case mechanics and talk about how modern life compartmentalizes violence in a way older societies did not. The point is not tidy comfort. It is a final reminder that the landscape, the history, and the killer all belong to the same regional story. The episode ends with an invitation to stay in Canada for the next one, while teasing a future comparison that links Canadian killers to Florida in a more spiritual than literal sense. That ending keeps the show's usual mix of bleakness, analogy, and side-eye humor. What this episode keeps doing, almost stubbornly, is refusing to separate murder from the social and geographic systems around it. It wants the listener to see the corridor, not just the crime scene. It wants the listener to notice how the same environment can produce violence, conceal it, and then help explain it after the fact. That makes the episode less tidy than a standard recap and more convincing as a piece of true-crime thinking.

As heard by us

A bleak regional map of violence that makes the Northwest feel like the point, not the backdrop.

This episode treats the Pacific Northwest as more than a backdrop. It connects the region to serial murder, skid rows, missing women, and a long history of violence, isolation, homelessness, alcoholism, and drug addiction.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Want a true-crime episode that links murder to place, pattern, and history?

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify