(1) S1E1The Case for Christian Nonviolence: Uncovering Presuppositions

August 3, 2019·48 min·3 clips

Only one person in his church said you can't kill a crying baby to save 50 lives, sparking a years-long moral crisis.

1. The Fourth Way podcast is named for a fourth response beyond fight, flight, or freeze: faithful nonviolence in the manner of Jesus Christ. 2. The host is the sole speaker, a former philosophy teacher and conservative Pennsylvania Christian who became a missionary in Romania before coming to a position of Christian nonviolence. 3. The episode's purpose is to help conservative Christian listeners identify their presuppositions before evaluating the case for nonviolence, by walking through the host's own story of uncovering bias. 4. The host grew up in a Pennsylvania community with Christian and American flags hanging side by side in the church-school, treating patriotism and Christianity as inseparable. 5. Three cultural features of his community are identified as relevant to nonviolence: Christian nationalism, the Puritan work ethic combined with individualism and personal responsibility, and gun culture. 6. Community members gave explicit advice about home defense: shoot intruders without asking questions, ensure they die rather than survive to sue, and shoot a fleeing burglar before he crosses the property line. 7. The host names this as 'indifference to human life' and identifies the cause as American individualism displacing Christ's command to love enemies. 8. The community's charity was selective: natural disasters abroad received sympathy, but an impoverished single mother who became pregnant outside of wedlock did not, because individualism precluded empathy for systemic disadvantage. 9. The community's political goal was to impose Christianity through legislation—Christian prayer in schools, banning same-sex marriage, displaying the Ten Commandments in courthouses—while largely giving divorce a pass. 10. Views on immigration are traced to the 'Christian nation' ideology: immigrants from Catholic Latin America were not considered true Christians and were seen as diluting the nation's religious identity. 11. Trump's 2016 entry forced a crisis: the host was appalled by Trump's character but unable to vote for Hillary Clinton due to abortion, while his community defended Trump's conduct at every turn. 12. The MASH conundrum—smothering a crying infant to save 50 lives on a wartime bus—had troubled the host for years; of 50 people consulted, one person immediately said you cannot kill the child, and it took the host five to six years to reach the same conclusion. 13. The convergence of the Trump contradiction and the MASH problem led the host to recognize his community as moral relativists and consequentialists despite their rhetoric against both. 14. He identifies the Mexican Catholic syncretism he once pitied—indigenous deities blended into Christianity under colonial coercion—as structurally identical to his own community's invisible idols of nationalism, pragmatism, and political control. 15. A friend sent a Harvard pacifism debate featuring seminary scholars; the host had previously heard similar arguments and dismissed them, but this time recognized his biases were gone. 16. The organization 'Followers of the Way' arranged the debate and directed the host to John Howard Yoder's 'The Politics of Jesus,' which he credits with making many things click. 17. The host introduces a cumulative case epistemology: no single argument for nonviolence is individually decisive, but collectively the evidence needs only reach 50.0001% probability to rationally compel the conclusion. 18. The episode's tone is confessional and reflective, organized as a personal narrative rather than a structured argument, intended to lower listeners' defenses before the positive case in future episodes. 19. Conservative Christians from American evangelical traditions—particularly those who have felt tension between their political commitments and the teachings of Jesus—will find this episode most directly relevant. 20. Listeners who have no background in conservative Christianity or who already hold pacifist views may find the personal story informative but the presupposition-clearing exercise largely redundant for them.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Fourth Way